» Articles » PMID: 31303715

Psychomotor Recovery of Dexmedetomidine Compared with Propofol After Sedation During Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Control Trial

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2019 Jul 16
PMID 31303715
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Early psychomotor recovery is an essential part of day care surgery which depends on brain integration of motor and sensory co-ordination. Even though dexmedetomidine is commonly used for day care procedures, the recovery profile was not studied. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate the psychomotor recovery of sedation with dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia.

Material And Methods: Sixty-six patients were included. Group D received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (loading dose) followed by 0.2-1 μg/kg/hour. Group received propofol infusion of 25-100 μg/kg/minute. Psychomotor recovery was assessed by finger-tapping, manual dexterity, visual spatial memory capacity, and pen and paper tests. Psychomotor tasks were given to the patients postoperatively at every 30 minutes for 2 hours followed by every hour up to 4 hours after surgery. Distribution of patients, age, weight, duration of surgery, and the level of sensory blockade was compared using independent -test. Student's -test has been used to find the significance of parameters such as heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO), psychomotor recovery between two groups. < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results: The motor recovery using finger tapping test was faster in Group D than Group (73.94 ± 42.13 vs 101.21 ± 37.98 minutes, P-value = 0.007). Motor recovery using peg board test was faster in Group than Group D (82.12 ± 40.37 vs 99.39 ± 43.08 minutes, P-value = 0.098). Visual spatial capacity memory test and pen and paper test were unaffected.

Conclusions: We conclude that patients who received dexmedetomidine showed earlier recovery with finger tapping test. Hence, we suggest to use dexmedetomidine for complete psychomotor recovery and fast-track discharging of the patient after spinal anesthesia.

Citing Articles

Effects of single-use alfentanil versus propofol on cognitive functions after colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.

Zhu X, Chen X, Zheng X, Lyu H, Chen J, Yan A Heliyon. 2023; 9(6):e17061.

PMID: 37389042 PMC: 10300329. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17061.


Comparison of the effect of dexmedetomidine and midazolam under spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial, single center study in South Korea.

Kang H, Lim T, Lee H, Kim T, Kim W, Chang H Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023; 18(2):159-168.

PMID: 37183284 PMC: 10183612. DOI: 10.17085/apm.22257.


Comparison of Recovery Profiles of Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy under Desflurane, Propofol, or Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Randomized, Prospective, Clinical, Comparative Study.

Verma A, Haldar R, Srivastava S, Das K, Mishra P J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2022; 13(2):226-235.

PMID: 35694079 PMC: 9187405. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743443.

References
1.
Hall J, Uhrich T, BARNEY J, Arain S, Ebert T . Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90(3):699-705. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00035. View

2.
Bonhomme V, Fiset P, Meuret P, Backman S, Plourde G, Paus T . Propofol anesthesia and cerebral blood flow changes elicited by vibrotactile stimulation: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85(3):1299-308. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.3.1299. View

3.
Arain S, Ebert T . The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation. Anesth Analg. 2002; 95(2):461-6, table of contents. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00042. View

4.
Nelson L, Lu J, Guo T, Saper C, Franks N, Maze M . The alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98(2):428-36. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00024. View

5.
Pujol J, Junque C, Vendrell P, Grau J, Capdevila A . Reduction of the substantia nigra width and motor decline in aging and Parkinson's disease. Arch Neurol. 1992; 49(11):1119-22. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530350033015. View