» Articles » PMID: 31302250

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device Implantation in Patients at Very High Risk for Stroke

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the role of left atrial appendage closure using the Watchman device (Boston Scientific) in patients who are at very high risk for stroke.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the role of Watchman in patients with CHADS-VASc ≥5.

Methods: All patients undergoing procedures for Watchman implant at our institution were enrolled in a prospective registry. All 104 consecutive recipients with CHADS-VASc ≥5 were included.

Results: Median patient age was 78.5 ± 6.4 years, 56% were male, mean CHADS-VASc was 5.7 ± 0.9, and mean HASBLED was 4.0 ± 1.0. Indications for implantation were significant prior bleeding (73%), unacceptable bleeding risk (21%), and unacceptable stroke and bleeding risk (6%). Watchman implantation was successful in all patients. All but 2 patients completed 45 days of postprocedural anticoagulation; 56% used warfarin and 44% used a novel oral anticoagulant. Transesophageal echocardiogram at 45 days revealed no significant peridevice leak. One patient was found to have a small mobile, filamentous echodensity attached on the medial aspect of the Watchman device. This resolved with longer anticoagulation with dabigatran and did not result in adverse outcome. At 1-year follow up, ischemic stroke had occurred in 3 patients (2.8%) at 96, 119, and 276 days after the procedure.

Conclusion: In a population of patients with mean CHADS-VASc of 5.7, Watchman implantation seemed to be safe and efficacious, with a residual annual ischemic stroke risk of 2.8%. In an atrial fibrillation population with a similar CHADS-VASc score, the estimated annual risk of stroke is ≈12% off anticoagulation and >4% on warfarin.

Citing Articles

Residual Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation.

Ding W Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021; 10(3):147-153.

PMID: 34777818 PMC: 8576486. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2021.34.


Long-Term Effect of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Treating Patients with Previous Ischemic Stroke on the Disease Recurrence.

Yu J, Liu Y, Sun P, Guo X, Jiang H, Fang W Comput Math Methods Med. 2021; 2021:6991002.

PMID: 34691240 PMC: 8528575. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6991002.


Recurrent embolisms despite adequate anticoagulant therapy in a patient with prosthetic heart valves and atrial fibrillation: a case report.

Marschall A, Rodriguez Torres D, Rueda Linares A, Marti Sanchez D Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021; 5(7):ytab263.

PMID: 34377911 PMC: 8343442. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab263.


Comparison Between Oral Anticoagulation and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Prevention of Stroke With Regard to Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Sandhu O, Aftab Z, Anthony A, Rahmat S, Khan S Cureus. 2020; 12(9):e10437.

PMID: 33072447 PMC: 7557113. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10437.


Indications and Outcome in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure-The Austrian LAAC Registry.

Zweiker D, Sieghartsleitner R, Fiedler L, Toth G, Luha O, Stix G J Clin Med. 2020; 9(10).

PMID: 33066034 PMC: 7600032. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103274.