» Articles » PMID: 31301634

Brain Impedance Variation of Directional Leads Implanted in Subthalamic Nuclei of Parkinsonian Patients

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2019 Jul 14
PMID 31301634
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems with ring-shaped leads generate spherical electrical fields. In contrast, novel directional leads use segmented electrodes. Aim of this study was to quantify the impedance variations over time in subjects with the directional Cartesia-Boston® system.

Methods: Impedance records, programming settings, and clinical data of 11 consecutive Parkinsonian patients implanted with DBS directional leads in two Italian centers (Udine and Vicenza) were retrospectively evaluated. Data were collected before starting stimulation (in the operating room and at days 5 and 40) and after switching stimulation on at the successive follow-up visits (1, 6 and 12 months).

Results: Directional leads have significantly higher impedance than ring leads. Stimulated contacts had always lower impedance compared to non-stimulated contacts. Before DBS-on, all contacts had higher impedance in the operating room, with an initial decrease five days post-surgery and a subsequent increase at day 40, more evident for directional contacts. The impedance of directional leads increased post-implantation at 1 and 6 months with a plateau at 12 months.

Conclusions: There was a significant difference between the directional and ring leads at baseline (before activation of DBS) and during follow-up (chronic DBS).

Significance: Our study reveals new information about the impedance of segmented electrodes that is useful for patient management during the initial test period, as well as during long-term DBS follow-up.

Citing Articles

Review of directional leads, stimulation patterns and programming strategies for deep brain stimulation.

Zhou Y, Song Y, Song X, He F, Xu M, Ming D Cogn Neurodyn. 2025; 19(1):33.

PMID: 39866658 PMC: 11757656. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10210-0.


Directional deep brain stimulation in the management of Parkinson's disease: efficacy and constraints-an analytical appraisal.

Macaneiro M, Azevedo A, Poerner B, da Silva M, Koerbel A Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):43.

PMID: 38216697 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02268-x.


Validation of Lead-DBS β-Oscillation Localization with Directional Electrodes.

Boex C, Al Awadhi A, Tyrand R, Corniola M, Kibleur A, Fleury V Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37627782 PMC: 10451384. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10080898.


Electrochemical and biological performance of hierarchical platinum-iridium electrodes structured by a femtosecond laser.

Li L, Jiang C, Duan W, Wang Z, Zhang F, He C Microsyst Nanoeng. 2022; 8:96.

PMID: 36065436 PMC: 9440118. DOI: 10.1038/s41378-022-00433-8.


Elevated Electrode Impedances During Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery May Be Due to Peri-Electrode Air Collections.

Klassen B, Rotter J, Crane C, Kaufmann T, Miller K Cureus. 2022; 14(1):e21518.

PMID: 35223294 PMC: 8862689. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21518.