» Articles » PMID: 31294265

Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record

Overview
Date 2019 Jul 12
PMID 31294265
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Limited health literacy is associated with worse health outcomes. It is standard practice in many primary care clinics to provide patients with written patient education materials (PEM), which often come directly from an electronic health record (EHR). We compared the health literacy of patients in a primary care residency clinic with EHR PEM readability by grade level. We assessed health literacy using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form (REALM-SF), and determined grade level readability for the PEM distributed for the five most common clinical diagnoses using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid metrics. Among 175 participants, health literacy was ≥9th grade for 76 patients (43.4%), 7th to 8th grade for 66 patients (37.7%), and ≤6th grade for 30 patients (17.1%). Average standard PEM readability by SMOG was grade 9.2 and easy-to-read PEM readability was grade 6.8. These findings suggest a discrepancy between the health literacy of most patients who were surveyed and standard PEM readability. Despite national guidelines encouraging clinicians to provide PEM at an appropriate reading level, our results indicate that PEM from EHR may not be readable for many patients. .

Citing Articles

Source Characteristics Influence AI-Enabled Orthopaedic Text Simplification: Recommendations for the Future.

Andalib S, Solomon S, Picton B, Spina A, Scolaro J, Nelson A JB JS Open Access. 2025; 10(1.

PMID: 39781102 PMC: 11703440. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00007.


Mobile Health Hearing Aid Acclimatization and Support Program in Low-Income Communities: Feasibility Study.

Frisby C, Eikelboom R, Mahomed-Asmail F, Kuper H, Moore D, de Kock T JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e46043.

PMID: 37610802 PMC: 10483300. DOI: 10.2196/46043.


Health Literacy in Oculofacial Plastic Surgery: A Literature Review.

Murdock N, Missner A, Mehta V Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41518.

PMID: 37551223 PMC: 10404445. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41518.


Assessment of freely available online videos of cardiac electrophysiological procedures from a shared decision-making perspective.

Iyer I, Iyer A, Kanthawar P, Khot U Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2022; 3(4):189-196.

PMID: 36046431 PMC: 9422056. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.06.003.


Health literacy characteristics of over-the-counter rapid antigen COVID-19 test materials.

Fulmer A, Abboud 2nd G, Wallace L Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022; 18(12):4124-4128.

PMID: 35987673 PMC: 9376145. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.08.003.


References
1.
Arozullah A, Yarnold P, Bennett C, Soltysik R, Wolf M, Ferreira R . Development and validation of a short-form, rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine. Med Care. 2007; 45(11):1026-33. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180616c1b. View

2.
Wilson M . Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations. Clin Nurse Spec. 2008; 23(1):33-40. DOI: 10.1097/01.NUR.0000343079.50214.31. View

3.
Eichler K, Wieser S, Brugger U . The costs of limited health literacy: a systematic review. Int J Public Health. 2009; 54(5):313-24. PMC: 3785182. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-0058-2. View

4.
Carrier E, Reschovsky J . Expectations outpace reality: physicians' use of care management tools for patients with chronic conditions. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010; (129):1-4. View

5.
Fitzsimmons P, Michael B, Hulley J, Scott G . A readability assessment of online Parkinson's disease information. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2010; 40(4):292-6. DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2010.401. View