» Articles » PMID: 31294260

Use of Recommended Communication Techniques by Diabetes Educators

Overview
Date 2019 Jul 12
PMID 31294260
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Diabetes educators are challenged to teach diabetes self-management to patients, ensuring comprehension. Effectiveness with patients may be dependent on the communication skills of the diabetes educator.

Objective: This study sought to determine diabetes educators' use of and perceived effectiveness of recommended communication techniques with patients to teach diabetes self-management and to determine differences in communication by educator characteristics.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a convenience sample of 522 diabetes educators, comprised mostly of nurses, dieticians, and pharmacists, completed the American Medical Association (AMA) Communication Techniques Survey at a national conference. The AMA survey assessed diabetes educators' self-reported use of and perceived effectiveness of 14 communication techniques. Internal consistency for items reporting frequency of communication techniques was α = 0.83 and for items reporting perceived effectiveness was α = 0.87.

Key Results: Simple language, written patient education materials, and using Teach-Back were the most frequently reported techniques. Follow-up phone calls and drawing pictures were the least reported. Educators of Hispanic ethnicity used significantly more communication techniques than Caucasian respondents ( < .05). Educators with more than 16 years in practice and those who provided more than 16 hours of diabetes education per week used significantly more techniques than those with less experience ( < .01). Nurses used significantly more techniques than dieticians ( < .01) and those who had health literacy or communication as part of their schooling used more techniques than those who did not ( < .05). No significant difference on the routine use of communication techniques was found by education level or diabetes educator certification status.

Conclusions: The findings provide a baseline assessment of diabetes educator communication practice. Inclusion of health literacy and communication in health professional school curricula appears to support competency, suggesting opportunities for inter-professional health literacy and communication education and research. .

Plain Language Summary: We did a survey asking diabetes educators how they communicate with their patients with diabetes. They mostly used simple language, gave out pamphlets, and used Teach-Back. They did not draw pictures to help explain things. Diabetes educators who were Hispanic, nurses, and had health literacy training in school used more communication techniques. Health literacy and communication should be included in training of health providers.

Citing Articles

Expert panel opinion on the optimal educational pathway for diabetes educators for training people with type 1 diabetes on the MiniMed™ 780G system: a Delphi consensus.

Gallen G, Rosso A, Alonso-Carril N, Arbeli S, Bahon V, Brown V Acta Diabetol. 2024; .

PMID: 39470803 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-024-02388-w.


'Analogy-Based Comprehensive Diabetes Education' (ABCDE) Improves Glycemic Control of Diabetic Patients in an Underserved Population: Results of a Retrospective Chart Analysis.

Sekhar R Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(3).

PMID: 35326887 PMC: 8953270. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10030409.


An Exploration of Knowledge and Themes on Diabetes during Outpatient Consultation in a Tertiary Referral Hospital.

Uy A, Chiu H, Larrazabal Jr R, Jimeno C J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2021; 36(1):31-36.

PMID: 34177085 PMC: 8214357. DOI: 10.15605/jafes.036.01.05.


The AMA Communication Techniques Survey: A Psychometric Analysis.

Walker D, Howe C Health Lit Res Pract. 2019; 1(4):e208-e215.

PMID: 31294266 PMC: 6607786. DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20170912-01.

References
1.
Schwartzberg J, Cowett A, VanGeest J, Wolf M . Communication techniques for patients with low health literacy: a survey of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. Am J Health Behav. 2007; 31 Suppl 1:S96-104. DOI: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S96. View

2.
Sudore R, Landefeld C, Perez-Stable E, Bibbins-Domingo K, Williams B, Schillinger D . Unraveling the relationship between literacy, language proficiency, and patient-physician communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 75(3):398-402. PMC: 4068007. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.019. View

3.
Turner T, Cull W, Bayldon B, Klass P, Sanders L, Frintner M . Pediatricians and health literacy: descriptive results from a national survey. Pediatrics. 2009; 124 Suppl 3:S299-305. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1162F. View

4.
Parker R, Ratzan S . Health literacy: a second decade of distinction for Americans. J Health Commun. 2010; 15 Suppl 2:20-33. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2010.501094. View

5.
Coleman C . Teaching health care professionals about health literacy: a review of the literature. Nurs Outlook. 2011; 59(2):70-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.12.004. View