» Articles » PMID: 31286048

Early to Midterm Results of "low-friction" Articulating Antibiotic Spacers for Septic Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2019 Jul 10
PMID 31286048
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Infection of total knee arthroplasty is a complex problem often resulting in multiple surgeries for the patient. We examined the early to midterm results of a retained cemented "low-friction" metal-on-polyethylene articulating antibiotic spacer in total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with a total knee cemented articulating antibiotic spacer performed for joint sepsis. Patients were allowed full weight bearing and normal activities after eradication of the infection at 6 weeks postop. Two months later, patients were given the option of conversion to a revision implant vs retention of the spacer. We examined infection cure rate, mechanical failure, Knee Society Scores, range of motion, and patient factors associated with spacer retention.

Results: Fifty-five knees were studied with average follow-up of 1.8 years (0.2-8.4). Among patients choosing spacer retention (40%), the average follow-up time of the spacer was 3.3 years (0.6-8.4). Five patients (9.1%) required a repeat spacer for recurrent infection.

Conclusions: Usage of articulating cement antibiotic spacers with a metal-on-polyethylene bearing couple provides excellent infection eradication, while also resulting in good functional outcomes. Early evidence suggests that use of the implant can be extended beyond typical timeframes and, in certain patient populations, may be suitable for a single-stage procedure.

Citing Articles

Prosthetic spacers in two-stage revision for knee periprosthetic joint infection achieve better function and similar infection control.

Wu B, Su J, Zhang Z, Zeng J, Fang X, Li W Bone Joint Res. 2024; 13(6):306-314.

PMID: 38889904 PMC: 11188966. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.136.BJR-2023-0251.R1.


The Use of a Novel On-bone Femoral Spacer Molding Device for Reducing Femoral Spacer Complications in Periprosthetic Total Knee Infection: Preliminary Results.

Chulsomlee K, Warinsiriruk E, Thongchuea N, Sri-Utenchai N, Thamyongkit S, Jarungvittayakon C Arthroplast Today. 2024; 27:101400.

PMID: 38774406 PMC: 11106837. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101400.


Articulating Knee Spacers in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: All Polyethylene Tibia or Tibial Insert?.

Kinder K, Apple A, Barnes C, Stronach B, Mears S, Stambough J J Arthroplasty. 2023; 38(6):1145-1150.

PMID: 36878440 PMC: 10200764. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.079.

References
1.
Evans R . Successful treatment of total hip and knee infection with articulating antibiotic components: a modified treatment method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (427):37-46. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000143739.07632.7c. View

2.
Bozic K, Kurtz S, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail T . The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(1):45-51. PMC: 2795838. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0. View

3.
Phillips J, Crane T, Noy M, Elliott T, Grimer R . The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: a 15-year prospective survey. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(7):943-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17150. View

4.
Kurtz S, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong K, Zhao K, Parvizi J . Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(7):984-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017. View

5.
Lyons S, Wright C, Krute C, Rivera F, Carroll R, Shaw L . Confirming Sterility of an Autoclaved Infected Femoral Component for Use in an Articulated Antibiotic Knee Spacer: A Pilot Study. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 31(1):245-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.068. View