» Articles » PMID: 31285652

Emergent Repair of Paraesophageal Hernias and the Argument for Elective Repair

Overview
Journal JSLS
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2019 Jul 10
PMID 31285652
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: A feared complication of large paraesophageal hernias is incarceration necessitating emergent repair. According to previous studies, patients who require an emergent operation are subject to increased morbidity compared with patients undergoing elective operations. In this study, we detail patients who underwent hernia repair emergently and compare their outcomes with elective patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of the paraesophageal hernia repair operations between 2010 and 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with hernias that were repaired electively and patients with hernias that were repaired emergently. Perioperative complications and follow-up data regarding morbidity, mortality, and recurrence were also recorded. A propensity analysis was used to compare emergent and elective groups.

Results: Thirty patients had hernias repaired emergently, and 199 patients underwent elective procedures. Patients undergoing emergent repair were more likely to have a type IV hernia, have a partial gastrectomy or gastrostomy tube insertion as part of their procedure, have a postoperative complication, and have a longer hospital stay. However, propensity analysis was used to demonstrate that when characteristics of the emergent and elective groups were matched, differences in these factors were no longer significant. Having an emergent operation did not increase a patient's risk for recurrence.

Conclusion: Patients who had their hernias repaired emergently experienced complications at similar rates as those of elective patients with advanced age or comorbid conditions as demonstrated by the propensity analysis. The authors therefore recommend evaluation of all paraesophageal hernias for elective repair, especially in younger patients who are otherwise good operative candidates.

Citing Articles

Hiatal Hernias Revisited-A Systematic Review of Definitions, Classifications, and Applications.

Fuchs K, Kafetzis I, Hann A, Meining A Life (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39337928 PMC: 11433396. DOI: 10.3390/life14091145.


Endoscopic Reduction of an Acute Gastric Volvulus.

Pungwe P, Ukwade D, Patel A, Ajayi T, Ketwaroo G Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58198.

PMID: 38741858 PMC: 11090073. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58198.


Management of complicated diaphragmatic hernia in the acute setting: a WSES position paper.

Giuffrida M, Perrone G, Abu-Zidan F, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni L, Baiocchi G World J Emerg Surg. 2023; 18(1):43.

PMID: 37496073 PMC: 10373334. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00510-x.


Relief of Obstructive Shock with a Large Hiatal Hernia Occupying the Posterior Mediastinum by Urgent Endoscopy.

Aikawa T, Yamada T, Iida T Intern Med. 2023; 63(2):231-234.

PMID: 37197956 PMC: 10864082. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1674-23.


Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience.

Alasmar M, McKechnie I, Chaparala R Updates Surg. 2023; 75(5):1227-1233.

PMID: 36869223 PMC: 10359210. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01482-y.


References
1.
Mattar S, Bowers S, Galloway K, Hunter J, Smith C . Long-term outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16(5):745-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8194-7. View

2.
Pierre A, Luketich J, Fernando H, Christie N, Buenaventura P, Litle V . Results of laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernias: 200 consecutive patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 74(6):1909-15; discussion 1915-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04088-2. View

3.
ANDUJAR J, Papasavas P, Birdas T, Robke J, Raftopoulos Y, Gagne D . Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(3):444-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8823-4. View

4.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-13. PMC: 1360123. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. View

5.
Austin P, Mamdani M, Stukel T, Anderson G, Tu J . The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data. Stat Med. 2005; 24(10):1563-78. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2053. View