» Articles » PMID: 31285206

A Nationwide Flash-Mob Study for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome

Overview
Journal Ann Fam Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Jul 10
PMID 31285206
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Our primary objective was to evaluate the Marburg Heart Score (MHS), a clinical decision rule, or to develop an adapted clinical decision rule for family physicians (FPs) to safely rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients referred to secondary care for suspected ACS. The secondary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of using the flash-mob method, an innovative study design, for large-scale research in family medicine.

Methods: In this 2-week, nationwide, prospective, observational, flash-mob study, FPs collected data on possible ACS predictors and assessed ACS probability (on a scale of 1-10) in patients referred to secondary care for suspected ACS.

Results: We collected data for 258 patients in 2 weeks by mobilizing approximately 1 in 5 FPs throughout the country via ambassadors. A final diagnosis was obtained for 243 patients (94.2%), of whom 45 (18.5%) received a diagnosis of ACS. Sex, sex-adjusted age, and ischemic changes on electrocardiography were significantly associated with ACS. The sensitivity of the MHS (cut-off ≤2) was 75.0%, specificity was 44.0%, positive predictive value was 24.3%, and negative predictive value was 88.0%. For the FP assessment (cut-off ≤5), these test characteristics were 86.7%, 41.4%, 25.2%, and 93.2%, respectively.

Conclusions: For patients referred to emergency care, ACS could not be safely ruled out using the MHS or FP clinical assessment. The flash-mob study design may be a feasible alternative research method to investigate relatively simple, clinically relevant research questions in family medicine on a large scale and over a relatively short time frame.

Citing Articles

Chest Pain in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Risk Stratification Tools to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndrome.

van den Bulk S, Manten A, Bonten T, Harskamp R Ann Fam Med. 2024; 22(5):426-436.

PMID: 39313342 PMC: 11419710. DOI: 10.1370/afm.3141.


Diagnostic accuracy of signs and symptoms in acute coronary syndrome and acute myocardial infarction.

Raat W, Nees L, Vaes B Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024; 43(1):111-119.

PMID: 39308022 PMC: 11834805. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2406266.


Ruling out acute coronary syndrome in primary care with a clinical decision rule and a capillary, high-sensitive troponin I point of care test: study protocol of a diagnostic RCT in the Netherlands (POB HELP).

van den Bulk S, Petrus A, Willemsen R, Boogers M, Meeder J, Rahel B BMJ Open. 2023; 13(6):e071822.

PMID: 37290947 PMC: 10255045. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071822.


Burden Associated with Telephone Calls on COVID-19: Results of a Flash Mob Study in Family Practices.

Kersting C, Schmidt A, Maas M, Weckbecker K, Mortsiefer A ZFA (Stuttgart). 2023; 98(7-8):257-262.

PMID: 37275846 PMC: 10224644. DOI: 10.53180/zfa.2022.0257-0262.


Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care.

Manten A, De Clercq L, Rietveld R, Lucassen W, Moll van Charante E, Harskamp R Neth Heart J. 2022; 31(4):157-165.

PMID: 36580267 PMC: 10033786. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-022-01745-0.


References
1.
Bosner S, Becker A, Abu Hani M, Keller H, Sonnichsen A, Haasenritter J . Accuracy of symptoms and signs for coronary heart disease assessed in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2010; 60(575):e246-57. PMC: 2880766. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X502137. View

2.
Nilsson S, Scheike M, Engblom D, Karlsson L, Molstad S, Akerlind I . Chest pain and ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2003; 53(490):378-82. PMC: 1314597. View

3.
van Weel C, Schers H, Timmermans A . Health care in the Netherlands. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012; 25 Suppl 1:S12-7. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110212. View

4.
Bruins Slot M, Rutten F, Van der Heijden G, Geersing G, Glatz J, Hoes A . Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome in primary care: comparison of the physicians' risk estimation and a clinical decision rule. Fam Pract. 2011; 28(3):323-8. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmq116. View

5.
Haasenritter J, Bosner S, Vaucher P, Herzig L, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Baum E . Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care: external validation of a clinical prediction rule. Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62(599):e415-21. PMC: 3361121. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X649106. View