» Articles » PMID: 31285057

A Comparison of Collision Cross Section Values Obtained Via Travelling Wave Ion Mobility-mass Spectrometry and Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography-ion Mobility-mass Spectrometry: Application to the Characterisation of Metabolites in Rat...

Abstract

A comprehensive Collision Cross Section (CCS) library was obtained via Travelling Wave Ion Guide mobility measurements through direct infusion (DI). The library consists of CCS and Mass Spectral (MS) data in negative and positive ElectroSpray Ionisation (ESI) mode for 463 and 479 endogenous metabolites, respectively. For both ionisation modes combined, CCS data were obtained for 542 non-redundant metabolites. These data were acquired on two different ion mobility enabled orthogonal acceleration QToF MS systems in two different laboratories, with the majority of the resulting CCS values (from detected compounds) found to be within 1% of one another. Validation of these results against two independent, external CCS data sources and predicted CCS values indicated to be within 1-2% of these other values. The same metabolites were then analysed using a rapid reversed-phase ultra (high) performance liquid chromatographic (U(H)PLC) separation combined with IM and MS (IM-MS) thus providing retention time (t), m/z and CCS values (with the latter compared with the DI-IM-MS data). Analytes for which CCS values were obtained by U(H)PLC-IM-MS showed good agreement with the results obtained from DI-IM-MS. The repeatability of the CCS values obtained for these metabolites on the different ion mobility QToF systems, using either DI or LC, encouraged the further evaluation of the U(H)PLC-IM-MS approach via the analysis of samples of rat urine, from control and methotrexate-treated animals, in order to assess the potential of the approach for metabolite identification and profiling in metabolic phenotyping studies. Based on the database derived from the standards 63 metabolites were identified in rat urine, using positive ESI, based on the combination of t, CCS and MS data.

Citing Articles

Progress, applications, and challenges in high-throughput effect-directed analysis for toxicity driver identification - is it time for HT-EDA?.

Alvarez-Mora I, Arturi K, Been F, Buchinger S, El Mais A, Gallampois C Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 417(3):451-472.

PMID: 38992177 PMC: 11700053. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05424-4.


MobiLipid: A Tool for Enhancing CCS Quality Control of Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Lipidomics by Internal Standardization.

Hildebrand F, Koellensperger G, Causon T Anal Chem. 2024; 96(19):7380-7385.

PMID: 38693701 PMC: 11099887. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01253.


Collision Cross Section Prediction Based on Machine Learning.

Li X, Wang H, Jiang M, Ding M, Xu X, Xu B Molecules. 2023; 28(10).

PMID: 37241791 PMC: 10221386. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28104050.


Paper Spray Ionization Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry of Sebum Classifies Biomarker Classes for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease.

Sarkar D, Sinclair E, Lim S, Walton-Doyle C, Jafri K, Milne J JACS Au. 2022; 2(9):2013-2022.

PMID: 36186554 PMC: 9516698. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.2c00300.


[Applications of ion mobility-mass spectrometry in the chemical analysis in traditional Chinese medicines].

Zhai R, Gao W, Li M, Yang H Se Pu. 2022; 40(9):782-787.

PMID: 36156624 PMC: 9516353. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.01028.