» Articles » PMID: 31283462

Mucinous Neoplasms of the Ovary: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Overview
Journal Radiographics
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Jul 9
PMID 31283462
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mucinous neoplasms of the ovary account for 10%-15% of ovarian neoplasms. They may be benign, borderline, or malignant. The large majority are benign or borderline, accounting for 80% and 16%-17%, respectively. Mucinous neoplasms of the ovary most commonly affect women in their 20s to 40s. The clinical manifestation is nonspecific, but most mucinous ovarian neoplasms manifest as large unilateral pelvic masses. At gross pathologic analysis, mucinous ovarian neoplasms appear as large multiloculated cystic masses. The contents of the cyst loculi vary on the basis of differences in internal mucin content. At histologic analysis, mucinous ovarian neoplasms are composed of multiple cysts lined by mucinous epithelium, often resembling gastrointestinal-type epithelium. Imaging evaluation most commonly includes US and/or MRI. The imaging findings parallel the gross pathologic features and include a large, unilateral, multiloculated cystic mass. The cyst loculi vary in echogenicity, attenuation, and signal intensity depending on the mucin content. Mucinous neoplasms of the ovary are staged surgically using the FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) staging system. Primary treatment is surgical, with adjuvant chemotherapy considered in the uncommon case of mucinous carcinoma with extraovarian disease. Since most mucinous ovarian neoplasms are benign or borderline, the overall prognosis is excellent.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for malignant ovarian tumors mis-subclassified by the ultrasound-based ADNEX model.

Jiang M, Yuan C, Lu S, Zhu Y, Chu C, Li W Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1406735.

PMID: 40071091 PMC: 11893382. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1406735.


Unveiling a Large Pelvic Mass in a Middle-Aged Woman: The Consequences of Neglected Gynecological Care.

Anderson T, Carletto E, Burns B, Addison A Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75789.

PMID: 39816315 PMC: 11734833. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75789.


Does amide proton transfer-weighted MRI have diagnostic and differential value in ovarian cystic and predominantly cystic lesion?.

Ding D, Chang L, Men C, Yang B, Pylypenko D, Zhang T Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; .

PMID: 39694947 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04768-w.


Clinical characteristics, survival and prognostic nomogram for patients with esophageal mucinous adenocarcinoma: a SEER population-based analysis.

Liu Z, Yuan Y, Cao X, Ma M, Han B J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 15(5):2028-2040.

PMID: 39554570 PMC: 11565096. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-244.


A 33.5 cm Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma and Associated Comorbidities in an 89-Year-Old Female.

Tariq H, Abid F, Galloway J Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67970.

PMID: 39347369 PMC: 11427403. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67970.


References
1.
Jung S, Lee J, Eun Rha S, Byun J, Jung J, Hahn S . CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 2002; 22(6):1305-25. DOI: 10.1148/rg.226025033. View

2.
Rouzbahman M, Chetty R . Mucinous tumours of appendix and ovary: an overview and evaluation of current practice. J Clin Pathol. 2013; 67(3):193-7. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-202023. View

3.
Hess V, AHern R, Nasiri N, King D, Blake P, Barton D . Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: a separate entity requiring specific treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(6):1040-4. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.078. View

4.
Riopel M, Ronnett B, Kurman R . Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999; 23(6):617-35. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199906000-00001. View

5.
Seidman J, Horkayne-Szakaly I, Haiba M, Boice C, Kurman R, Ronnett B . The histologic type and stage distribution of ovarian carcinomas of surface epithelial origin. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003; 23(1):41-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.pgp.0000101080.35393.16. View