» Articles » PMID: 31281755

Re-expansion of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures Using Bilateral SpineJack Implants: Early Clinical Experience and Biomechanical Considerations

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2019 Jul 9
PMID 31281755
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Thoraco-lumbar osteoporotic compression fractures have a higher incidence of continued collapse with development of deformity and progression to vertebra plana when untreated and even after vertebral augmentation (VA) or balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). Even when there is the restoration of height and improvement in angulation, multiple long-term follow-up series have repeatedly documented that over time, many patients lose the initial height correction and in a smaller group the vertebral body re-collapses leading to the development of progressive deformity with an increased risk for adjacent level fractures. At first, larger balloons and more cement were used to try and avoid these problems, but it did not reduce the risk of adjacent fractures. Several procedures were developed to place various types of intervertebral implants combined with bone cement to maintain the initial height correction. Initial studies with these implants showed a reduction in adjacent level fractures but the systems did not proceed to market. The SpineJack(SJ) system (Stryker Corp, Kalamazoo, MI), consisting of bilateral expandable titanium implants supplemented with bone cement, was first used approximately 10 years ago in Europe and recently gained FDA approval in the United States. This system provides more symmetric and balanced lateral and anterior support and is effective with lesser amounts of bone cement compared to BKP. Follow-up studies have documented that there is equal or better pain control, with better long-term results based both on maintaining vertebral height restoration and deformity correction. Most importantly, statistically it clearly reduces the risk of adjacent level fractures by at least 60%. The biomechanical effects of intravertebral implants for osteoporotic fractures in regard to the risk of adjacent level fractures and preliminary experience with the use of the SJis reviewed.

Citing Articles

Age- and gender-dependent impact of titanium vertebral augmentation implants combined with cementing on subsequent vertebral fracture incidence: A comparative study with cementing alone.

Sun C, Yang Y, Lan C, Tran H, Pham T, Chiang Y Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(12):4513-4520.

PMID: 39367177 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08504-2.


Percutaneous Vertebral Reconstruction (PVR) Technique of Pathological Compression Fractures: An Innovative Combined Treatment of Microwave Ablation, Bilateral Expandable Titanium SpineJack Implants Followed by Vertebroplasty.

Pusceddu C, Marsico S, Derudas D, Ballicu N, Melis L, Zedda S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37445213 PMC: 10342544. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134178.


A 20-Year Review of Biomechanical Experimental Studies on Spine Implants Used for Percutaneous Surgical Repair of Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Gajavelli S, Gee A, Bagheri Z, Schemitsch E, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:6015067.

PMID: 36187502 PMC: 9519286. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6015067.


Biomechanical analysis of vertebral wedge deformity in elderly women with quantitative CT-based finite element analysis.

Liu J, Cheng X, Wang Y, Zhang P, Gao L, Yang X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):575.

PMID: 35701750 PMC: 9195195. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05518-z.


Re-expansion and Stabilization of Vertebra Plana Fractures Using Bilateral SpineJack® Implants.

Joyce D, Granville M, Jacobson R Cureus. 2021; 13(3):e13839.

PMID: 33728229 PMC: 7954647. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13839.


References
1.
Teng M, Wei C, Wei L, Luo C, Lirng J, Chang F . Kyphosis correction and height restoration effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24(9):1893-900. PMC: 7976281. View

2.
Majd M, Farley S, Holt R . Preliminary outcomes and efficacy of the first 360 consecutive kyphoplasties for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine J. 2005; 5(3):244-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.013. View

3.
Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G . Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J. 2005; 15(8):1255-64. PMC: 3233952. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0018-3. View

4.
Frankel B, Monroe T, Wang C . Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: an elevation in adjacent-level fracture risk in kyphoplasty as compared with vertebroplasty. Spine J. 2007; 7(5):575-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.020. View

5.
Tzermiadianos M, Renner S, Phillips F, Hadjipavlou A, Zindrick M, Havey R . Altered disc pressure profile after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture is a risk factor for adjacent vertebral body fracture. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17(11):1522-30. PMC: 2583190. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0775-x. View