» Articles » PMID: 31276451

Examining Prevalence and Risk Factors of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Using the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey

Overview
Specialty Nursing
Date 2019 Jul 6
PMID 31276451
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate prevalence and risk factors of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD).

Design: Retrospective analysis of 2016 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence survey data.

Subjects And Setting: Adult patients who were in acute care, long-term acute care, long-term care, and rehabilitation facilities in the United States and Canada.

Methods: IAD prevalence was calculated among all patients surveyed, among the incontinent patients only, across multiple care settings, and by incontinence type. A logistic regression examined risk factors for IAD in the incontinent population.

Results: Nearly 1 in 5 incontinent patients had IAD documented. Incontinence-associated dermatitis prevalence in the entire patient population was 4.3% while incontinence prevalence was 18%. Of incontinent patients, prevalence of IAD ranged from 8.4% in long-term care facilities to 19% in acute care facilities. Facilities with higher rates of incontinence did not necessarily have higher prevalence of IAD. Incontinence-associated dermatitis prevalence by incontinence type ranged from 12% for patients with urinary incontinence to 26% for patients with fecal management systems. Regression results support the association of the following factors with an increased likelihood of IAD documented: all types of incontinence, fecal management systems, higher body weight, diminished mobility, additional linen layers, longer length of stay, and lower Braden Scale scores.

Conclusions: Incontinence-associated dermatitis remains a concern in acute care settings. Risk factors associated with IAD were similar to risk factors previously reported for hospital-acquired pressure injuries, such as limited mobility, longer lengths of stay, and additional linen layers. By consistently documenting IAD as well as pressure injury prevalence, facilities may benchmark overall skin prevention models.

Citing Articles

Involvement of Urease-Producing Bacteria on Genital Skin in Community-Dwelling Women with Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kohta M, Sugama J J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:5737-5747.

PMID: 39655293 PMC: 11625642. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S492458.


Nurses' Knowledge Regarding Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis.

Asiri S, Alzahrani N, Alharbi H, Ayoub M Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024; 17:2917-2928.

PMID: 39619628 PMC: 11608039. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S485306.


Translation, psychometric testing and implementation of the perineal assessment tool for assessing incontinence-associated dermatitis risk in semi-intensive care patients.

Simim S, Banharak S, Panpanit L, Chanaboon S, Sommana C, Promnoi C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29787.

PMID: 39616249 PMC: 11608365. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81577-7.


Applying natural language processing to understand symptoms among older adult home healthcare patients with urinary incontinence.

Scharp D, Song J, Hobensack M, Palmer M, Barcelona V, Topaz M J Nurs Scholarsh. 2024; 57(1):152-164.

PMID: 39601443 PMC: 11772115. DOI: 10.1111/jnu.13038.


Effects of a mattress cover with special airflow technology on the structure and function of the sacral and heel skin during loading: A two-arm exploratory crossover trial.

Kottner J, Amin R, Tomova-Simitchieva T, Hillmann K, Blume-Peytavi U Int Wound J. 2024; 21(7):e14957.

PMID: 38994923 PMC: 11240536. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14957.


References
1.
Williamson R, Lachenbruch C, VanGilder C . The effect of multiple layers of linens on surface interface pressure: results of a laboratory study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2013; 59(6):38-48. View

2.
Beeckman D, Verhaeghe S, Defloor T, Schoonhoven L, Vanderwee K . A 3-in-1 perineal care washcloth impregnated with dimethicone 3% versus water and pH neutral soap to prevent and treat incontinence-associated dermatitis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011; 38(6):627-34. DOI: 10.1097/WON.0b013e31822efe52. View

3.
Boronat-Garrido X, Kottner J, Schmitz G, Lahmann N . Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis in Nursing Homes: Prevalence, Severity, and Risk Factors in Residents With Urinary and/or Fecal Incontinence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016; 43(6):630-635. DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000282. View

4.
Krupp A, Monfre J . Pressure ulcers in the ICU patient: an update on prevention and treatment. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2015; 17(3):468. DOI: 10.1007/s11908-015-0468-7. View

5.
VanGilder C, MacFarlane G, Meyer S, Lachenbruch C . Body mass index, weight, and pressure ulcer prevalence: an analysis of the 2006-2007 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Surveys. J Nurs Care Qual. 2009; 24(2):127-35. DOI: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000347449.83052.1a. View