» Articles » PMID: 31268828

Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis and Muscle Hypertrophy Individualized Responses to Systematically Changing Resistance Training Variables in Trained Young Men

Overview
Date 2019 Jul 4
PMID 31268828
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables is used among athletes, recreational exercisers, and compromised populations (e.g., elderly) attempting to potentiate muscle hypertrophy. However, it is unknown whether an individual's inherent predisposition dictates the RT-induced muscle hypertrophic response. Resistance-trained young [26 (3) y] men ( = 20) performed 8 wk unilateral RT (2 times/wk), with 1 leg randomly assigned to a standard progressive RT [control (CON)] and the contralateral leg to a variable RT (VAR; modulating exercise load, volume, contraction type, and interset rest interval). The VAR leg completed all 4 RT variations every 2 wk. Bilateral vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, pre- and post-RT and acute integrated myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates were assessed at rest and over 48 h following the final RT session. Muscle CSA increase was similar between CON and VAR ( > 0.05), despite higher total training volume (TTV) in VAR ( < 0.05). The 0-48-h integrated MyoPS increase postexercise was slightly greater for VAR than CON ( < 0.05). All participants were considered "responders" to RT, although none benefited to a greater extent from a specific protocol. Between-subjects variability (MyoPS, 3.30%; CSA, 37.8%) was 40-fold greater than the intrasubject (between legs) variability (MyoPS, 0.08%; CSA, 0.9%). The higher TTV and greater MyoPS response in VAR did not translate to a greater muscle hypertrophic response. Manipulating common RT variables elicited similar muscle hypertrophy than a standard progressive RT program in trained young men. Intrinsic individual factors are key determinants of the MyoPS and change in muscle CSA compared with extrinsic manipulation of common RT variables. Systematically manipulating resistance training (RT) variables during RT augments the stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) and training volume but fails to potentiate muscle hypertrophy compared with a standard progressive RT. Any modest further MyoPS increase and higher training volumes do not reflect in a greater hypertrophic response. Between-subject variability was 40-fold greater than the variability promoted by extrinsic manipulation of RT variables, indicating that individual intrinsic factors are stronger determinants of the hypertrophic response.

Citing Articles

Clinical Application of Skeletal Muscle Quantity and Quality Assessment Using Bioelectrical Impedance and Ultrasound Images.

Taniguchi M Phys Ther Res. 2024; 27(2):49-57.

PMID: 39257525 PMC: 11382794. DOI: 10.1298/ptr.R0031.


Responsiveness of functional performance and muscle strength, power, and size to resistance training: A systematic review.

Moda T, Viana R, Dias R, Penna E, Coswig V Sports Med Health Sci. 2024; 6(2):111-122.

PMID: 38708326 PMC: 11067735. DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2023.12.003.


Ladder-based resistance training with the progression of training load altered the tibial nerve ultrastructure and muscle fiber area without altering the morphology of the postsynaptic compartment.

Krause Neto W, Silva W, Oliveira T, Vilas Boas A, Ciena A, Caperuto E Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1371839.

PMID: 38694209 PMC: 11061484. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1371839.


The Plateau in Muscle Growth with Resistance Training: An Exploration of Possible Mechanisms.

Kataoka R, Hammert W, Yamada Y, Song J, Seffrin A, Kang A Sports Med. 2023; 54(1):31-48.

PMID: 37787845 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01932-y.


Mechanisms of mechanical overload-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy: current understanding and future directions.

Roberts M, McCarthy J, Hornberger T, Phillips S, Mackey A, Nader G Physiol Rev. 2023; 103(4):2679-2757.

PMID: 37382939 PMC: 10625844. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00039.2022.