» Articles » PMID: 31267199

Microfluidic-based Immunohistochemistry for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: a Comparative Clinical Study

Overview
Journal Virchows Arch
Date 2019 Jul 4
PMID 31267199
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease. The efficacy of tailored therapeutic strategies relies on the precise detection of diagnostic biomarkers by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Therefore, considering the increasing incidence of breast cancer cases, a concomitantly time-efficient and accurate diagnosis is clinically highly relevant. Microfluidics is a promising innovative technology in the field of tissue diagnostic, enabling for rapid, reliable, and automated immunostaining. We previously reported the microfluidic-based HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) detection in breast carcinomas to greatly correlate with the HER2 gene amplification level. Here, we aimed to develop a panel of microfluidic-based IHC protocols for prognostic and therapeutic markers routinely assessed for breast cancer diagnosis, namely HER2, estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR), and Ki67 proliferation factor. The microfluidic IHC protocol for each marker was optimized to reach high staining quality comparable to the standard procedure, while concomitantly shortening the staining time to 16 min-excluding deparaffinization and antigen retrieval step-with a turnaround time reduction up to 7 folds. Comparison of the diagnostic score on 50 formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor resections by microfluidic versus standard staining showed high concordance (overall agreement: HER2 94%, ER 95.9%, PR 93.6%, Ki67 93.7%) and strong correlation (ρ coefficient: ER 0.89, PR 0.88, Ki67 0.87; p < 0.0001) for all the analyzed markers. Importantly, HER2 genetic reflex test for all discordant cases confirmed the scores obtained by the microfluidic technique. Overall, the microfluidic-based IHC represents a clinically validated equivalent approach to the standard chromogenic staining for rapid, accurate, and automated breast cancer diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Modeling intratumor heterogeneity in breast cancer.

McDonough E, Barroso M, Ginty F, Corr D Biofabrication. 2024; 17(1.

PMID: 39642392 PMC: 11740194. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad9b50.


Microfluidic Point-of-Care (POC) Devices in Early Diagnosis: A Review of Opportunities and Challenges.

Yang S, Lv S, Zhang W, Cui Y Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(4).

PMID: 35214519 PMC: 8875995. DOI: 10.3390/s22041620.


Engineering Breast Cancer On-chip-Moving Toward Subtype Specific Models.

Moccia C, Haase K Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:694218.

PMID: 34249889 PMC: 8261144. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.694218.

References
1.
Roepman P, Horlings H, Krijgsman O, Kok M, Bueno-de-Mesquita J, Bender R . Microarray-based determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 receptor status in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15(22):7003-11. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0449. View

2.
Hammond M, Hayes D, Dowsett M, Allred D, Hagerty K, Badve S . American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(16):2784-95. PMC: 2881855. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529. View

3.
Prat A, Chon U Cheang M, Martin M, Parker J, Carrasco E, Caballero R . Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 31(2):203-9. PMC: 3532392. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.4134. View

4.
Ciftlik A, Lehr H, Gijs M . Microfluidic processor allows rapid HER2 immunohistochemistry of breast carcinomas and significantly reduces ambiguous (2+) read-outs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(14):5363-8. PMC: 3619345. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211273110. View

5.
Wolff A, Hammond M, Hicks D, Dowsett M, McShane L, Allison K . Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(31):3997-4013. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984. View