Touch DNA: Impact of Handling Time on Touch Deposit and Evaluation of Different Recovery Techniques: An Experimental Study

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2019 Jul 4

PMID 31267029

Citations 11

Authors

Francesco Sessa

Monica Salerno

Giuseppe Bertozzi

Giovanni Messina

Pietrantonio Ricci

Caterina Ledda

Venerando Rapisarda

Santina Cantatore

Emanuela Turillazzi

Cristoforo Pomara

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

"Touch DNA" is DNA obtained from biological material transferred from a donor to an object or a person during physical contact. This particular kind of evidence could play an essential role in forensic laboratory work and is considered an important tool for investigators. Even though the principal aspects of "Touch DNA" have been extensively studied, to date, there are few reports in the research field of DNA retrieval from garments that have been worn. This study aimed to investigate the "handling time", analyzing particularly the minimum contact time required to deposit a sufficient amount of DNA on a garment to produce an interpretable profile of the "handler". Moreover, three different sampling techniques were compared ("dry swab", "cutting out", and "adhesive tape") with the aim of defining the technique that guarantees the best recovery of the three methods tested. Analyzing the data of this experimental model, a "handling time" of two seconds is enough to release sufficient DNA on to a garment to obtain a complete profile. Moreover, this study demonstrated that when targeting for foreign DNA, the sample area should be narrowed down as much as possible to the smallest area possible to maximize target DNA recovery.

Citing Articles

Enhancing trace DNA profile recovery in forensic casework using the amplicon RX post-PCR clean-up kit.

Aljanahi N, Alketbi S, Almheiri M, Alshehhi S, Sanqoor A, Alghanim H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3324.

PMID: 39865146 PMC: 11770088. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88164-4.

Detection of invisible biological traces in relation to the physicochemical properties of substrates surfaces in forensic casework.

Recipon M, Agniel R, Kunemann P, Ponche A, Carreiras F, Hermitte F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):13271.

PMID: 38858407 PMC: 11164948. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63911-1.

Comparison of swabbing and cutting-out DNA collection methods from cotton, paper, and cardboard surfaces.

Kuffel A, Daeid N, Gray A Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024; 8:100453.

PMID: 38283046 PMC: 10821607. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100453.

Indirect DNA Transfer and Forensic Implications: A Literature Review.

Sessa F, Pomara C, Esposito M, Grassi P, Cocimano G, Salerno M Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(12).

PMID: 38136975 PMC: 10742555. DOI: 10.3390/genes14122153.

Targeting cell-derived markers to improve the detection of invisible biological traces for the purpose of genetic-based criminal identification.

Recipon M, Agniel R, Leroy-Dudal J, Fritz T, Carreiras F, Hermitte F Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18105.

PMID: 37872292 PMC: 10593828. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45366-y.

References

Poetsch M, Pfeifer M, Konrad H, Bajanowski T, Helmus J . Impact of several wearers on the persistence of DNA on clothes-a study with experimental scenarios. Int J Legal Med. 2017; 132(1):117-123. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1742-z. View

Meakin G, Jamieson A . DNA transfer: review and implications for casework. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013; 7(4):434-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.03.013. View

van Oorschot R, Jones M . DNA fingerprints from fingerprints. Nature. 1997; 387(6635):767. DOI: 10.1038/42838. View

Barash M, Reshef A, Brauner P . The use of adhesive tape for recovery of DNA from crime scene items. J Forensic Sci. 2010; 55(4):1058-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01416.x. View

Forsberg C, Jansson L, Ansell R, Hedman J . High-throughput DNA extraction of forensic adhesive tapes. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016; 24:158-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.06.004. View

Buckingham A, Harvey M, van Oorschot R . The origin of unknown source DNA from touched objects. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016; 25:26-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.015. View

van Oorschot R, Glavich G, Mitchell R . Persistence of DNA deposited by the original user on objects after subsequent use by a second person. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013; 8(1):219-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.10.005. View

Oldoni F, Castella V, Hall D . Shedding light on the relative DNA contribution of two persons handling the same object. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016; 24:148-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.002. View

Jones S, Scott K, Lewis J, Davidson G, Allard J, Lowrie C . DNA transfer through nonintimate social contact. Sci Justice. 2016; 56(2):90-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.10.004. View

10.

Blackman S, Stafford-Allen B, Hanson E, Panasiuk M, Brooker A, Rendell P . Developmental validation of the ParaDNA Body Fluid ID System-A rapid multiplex mRNA-profiling system for the forensic identification of body fluids. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018; 37:151-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.012. View

11.

Lowe A, Murray C, Whitaker J, Tully G, Gill P . The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces. Forensic Sci Int. 2002; 129(1):25-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00207-4. View

12.

Farash K, Hanson E, Ballantyne J . Single source DNA profile recovery from single cells isolated from skin and fabric from touch DNA mixtures in mock physical assaults. Sci Justice. 2018; 58(3):191-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.12.006. View

13.

Dong H, Wang J, Zhang T, Ge J, Dong Y, Sun Q . Comparison of preprocessing methods and storage times for touch DNA samples. Croat Med J. 2017; 58(1):4-13. PMC: 5346895. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2017.58.4. View

14.

Fonnelop A, Ramse M, Egeland T, Gill P . The implications of shedder status and background DNA on direct and secondary transfer in an attack scenario. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017; 29:48-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.019. View

15.

Petricevic S, Bright J, Cockerton S . DNA profiling of trace DNA recovered from bedding. Forensic Sci Int. 2005; 159(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.06.004. View

16.

Burrill J, Daniel B, Frascione N . A review of trace "Touch DNA" deposits: Variability factors and an exploration of cellular composition. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018; 39:8-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.019. View

17.

Kirgiz I, Calloway C . Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017; 47:9-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.01.007. View

18.

Soltyszewski I, Szeremeta M, Skawronska M, Niemcunowicz-Janica A, Pepinski W . Typeability of DNA in Touch Traces Deposited on Paper and Optical Data Discs. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015; 24(3):437-40. DOI: 10.17219/acem/34474. View

19.

Johnson D, Raymond D, Chen C, Quon M, Lis J, Choi M . A Molecular Method to Detect Wound Cells in Bloodstains Resultant of Sharp Force Injuries for Crime Scene Reconstruction. J Forensic Sci. 2017; 63(3):842-848. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13623. View

20.

Stanciu C, Philpott M, Kwon Y, Bustamante E, Ehrhardt C . Optical characterization of epidermal cells and their relationship to DNA recovery from touch samples. F1000Res. 2016; 4:1360. PMC: 4732551. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7385.1. View