» Articles » PMID: 31265378

Effect of Surface Treatment with CO Laser on Bond Strength in Composite Resin Restorations

Abstract

Evaluate the bond strength of repairs made on composite resin following the treatment of the surface of the flaw with different bonding agents and/or CO laser. The influence of CO laser and its interaction with other bonding agents on the surface of the flaw is not yet known. In this study, CO laser was chosen to treat the surface of the flaw due to its capacity to promote irregularities on the surface that enhance mechanical micro-retention. A block was created with Vitra APS nanohybrid composite resin (color: A3; FGM, Joinville, Brazil) measuring 5 mm in width, length, and depth (volume: 125 mm). The surface of the flaw was treated before the repair with an adhesive, silane bonding agent, and/or CO laser. Six specimens were created in composite resin for each group (total:  = 36): G1: resin+resin; G2: adhesive+resin; G3: laser+adhesive; G4: laser+silane+adhesive; G5: silane+adhesive; G6: laser+silane. After the repair, the surfaces of the fracture of all specimens, which were submitted to the microtraction test, were analyzed under an optical microscope. Bond strength values obtained according to the type of surface treatment were tabulated and submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis test. Dunn's test was used to compare means. G3 and G4 had significantly higher bond strength values compared to all other groups tested. Adhesive fractures predominated in all groups. However, G3 and G4 had a higher percentage of cohesive fractures compared to the other groups. The application of CO laser as a surface treatment led to greater bond strength of composite resin repairs in comparison with the groups that only received treatment with a burr and silanization. The groups submitted to CO laser also had a significantly lower number of adhesive failures when submitted to the microtraction test.

Citing Articles

Effect of Er:YAG, Co2 lasers, papain, and bromelain enzymes dentin treatment on shear bond strength of composite resin.

Sharafeddin F, Maroufi S Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022; 8(6):1575-1581.

PMID: 36016491 PMC: 9760143. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.651.