» Articles » PMID: 31263487

Sex Differences in Cognition and Their Relationship to Male Mate Choice

Overview
Journal Curr Zool
Date 2019 Jul 3
PMID 31263487
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Male cognition has gained recognition as an important potential player in sexual selection. A number of studies have found positive correlations between male sexual signals and cognitive performance and/or female preferences for males with better cognitive performance, although other studies have not found these relationships. Sex roles can differ dramatically, and sex differences in selection on cognition likely follow from the different tasks associated with these sex roles. Here, using threespine stickleback , a species with clearly divergent sex roles and mutual mate choice, we focus on the cognitive trait inhibitory control because males must differentially respond to reproductive females versus other sticklebacks while defending territories and refrain from eating eggs and fry while performing paternal care. We presented fish with a detour task four times over a period of 7 days, allowing us to assess initial inhibitory control and improvement over time. We ask 1) whether there are sex differences in inhibitory control and 2) whether male mate choice is associated with female inhibitory control. Although males outperformed females on three different measures of detour task performance across four trials, these differences were largely explained by males being less neophobic than females. Females took more trials to successfully solve the detour task, even after accounting for sex differences in neophobia. Female cognitive abilities, however, were unrelated to the vigor with which males courted them. The equivocal results regarding sex differences in cognitive ability suggest further study given the very different selection pressures each sex experiences.

Citing Articles

Sex predicts response to novelty and problem-solving in a wild bird with female-biased sexual dimorphism.

Danel S, Rebout N, Bonadonna F, Biro D Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2037):20242277.

PMID: 39689879 PMC: 11651883. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2277.


A reinvestigation of cognitive styles in sticklebacks: decision success varies with behavioral type.

Jones N, Gaffney K, Gardella G, Rowe A, Spence-Jones H, Munson A Behav Ecol. 2024; 36(1):arae097.

PMID: 39664074 PMC: 11631196. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arae097.


Inhibitory control in teleost fish: a methodological and conceptual review.

Lucon-Xiccato T Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):27.

PMID: 38530456 PMC: 10965611. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01867-5.


Heritability of cognitive performance in wild Western Australian magpies.

Speechley E, Ashton B, Thornton A, Simmons L, Ridley A R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(3):231399.

PMID: 38481983 PMC: 10933533. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231399.


Maze design: size and number of choices impact fish performance in cognitive assays.

Jones N, Cortese D, Munson A, Spence-Jones H, Storm Z, Killen S J Fish Biol. 2023; 103(5):974-984.

PMID: 37386747 PMC: 10952265. DOI: 10.1111/jfb.15493.


References
1.
Laland , Reader . Foraging innovation in the guppy. Anim Behav. 1999; 57(2):331-340. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0967. View

2.
Reader , Laland . Diffusion of foraging innovations in the guppy. Anim Behav. 2000; 60(2):175-180. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1450. View

3.
Uy J, Patricelli G, Borgia G . Loss of preferred mates forces female satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) to increase mate searching. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1467):633-8. PMC: 1088650. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1413. View

4.
Reader S, Laland K . Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(7):4436-41. PMC: 123666. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.062041299. View

5.
Hebets E . Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(23):13390-5. PMC: 263824. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2333262100. View