» Articles » PMID: 31259183

Predictors of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Jul 2
PMID 31259183
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The benefits of hip arthroscopic surgery in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) have been well established; however, some patients may experience a greater degree of improvement than others. Identifying positive and negative predictors of outcomes would assist the orthopaedic surgeon's management algorithm for patients with FAI.

Purpose/hypothesis: The objective of this systematic review was to identify demographic, radiographic, and other operative predictors of positive and negative outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for patients with FAI. It was hypothesized that factors including FAI morphology, age, body mass index (BMI), sex, dysplasia, articular cartilage damage, radiographic joint space, and labral treatment would predict outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery.

Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Three databases (Embase, PubMed, and Ovid [MEDLINE]) were searched on May 19, 2018, using terms including "hip," "arthroscopy," and "FAI." Studies were screened and data extracted in duplicate.

Results: A total of 39 studies were included in this systematic review, comprising 9272 hips with a mean age of 36.5 years (47.2% female). Younger age, male sex, lower BMI (<24.5 kg/m), Tönnis grade 0, and preoperative pain relief from diagnostic intra-articular hip injections predicted positive outcomes. Female sex, older age (>45 years), longer duration of preoperative symptoms (>8 months), elevated BMI, increased Tönnis grade (≥1), chondral defects, decreased joint space (≤2 mm), increased Kellgren-Lawrence grade (>3), increased lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), and undergoing labral debridement alone were predictors of negative outcomes.

Conclusion: In patients with FAI, younger age, male sex, lower BMI (<24.5 kg/m), Tönnis grade 0, and pain relief from preoperative intra-articular hip injections are significantly more likely to achieve positive outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery. On the other hand, older age (>45 years), female sex, elevated BMI, osteoarthritic changes, decreased joint space (≤2 mm), chondral defects, increased LCEA, and undergoing labral debridement compared with labral repair are associated with negative outcomes.

Citing Articles

Preoperative quantitative imaging use in predicting intraoperative decision for hip labral repair versus reconstruction.

Alder C, Wait T, Wipf C, Keeter C, Peszek A, Mayer S J Hip Preserv Surg. 2025; 11(4):287-297.

PMID: 39839552 PMC: 11744471. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnae035.


Hip preservation surgery for borderline and frank dysplasia: an overview of systematic reviews.

Martz P, Magendie J, Ramos-Pascual S, Kumble A, Boutaud B, Verdier N EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(12):1144-1155.

PMID: 39620562 PMC: 11619730. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0152.


Arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement yields favourable patient-reported outcomes and method survivorship at 10-year follow-up.

Nikou S, Sturesson J, Lindman I, Karlsson L, Ohlin A, Hamrin Senorski E Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024; 33(3):1104-1111.

PMID: 39435605 PMC: 11848980. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12511.


Outcomes of Painful Hips After Hip Arthroscopy Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Verma G, Goru P, Heaton R, Ahmed T, Ismail M, Shah S Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e68190.

PMID: 39347265 PMC: 11439185. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68190.


Subspine Impingement of the Hip Secondary to Ossified Rectus Femoris Avulsion Injury.

Ha A, Motamedi D, Sweetwood K Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(10):4474-4477.

PMID: 39188619 PMC: 11345127. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.07.031.


References
1.
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J . Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73(9):712-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x. View

2.
Lequesne M, Malghem J, Dion E . The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004; 63(9):1145-51. PMC: 1755132. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2003.018424. View

3.
Tannast M, Siebenrock K, Anderson S . Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(6):1540-52. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0921. View

4.
Stahelin L, Stahelin T, Jolles B, Herzog R . Arthroscopic offset restoration in femoroacetabular cam impingement: accuracy and early clinical outcome. Arthroscopy. 2008; 24(1):51-57.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.010. View

5.
Philippon M, Briggs K, Yen Y, Kuppersmith D . Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 91(1):16-23. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.21329. View