» Articles » PMID: 31255105

Amplitude Modulation Detection and Temporal Modulation Cutoff Frequency in Normal Hearing Infants

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2019 Jul 1
PMID 31255105
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine if temporal modulation cutoff frequency was mature in three-month-old infants. Normal-hearing infants and young adults were tested in a single-interval forced-choice observer-based psychoacoustic procedure. Two parameters of the temporal modulation transfer function (TMTF) were estimated to separate temporal resolution from amplitude modulation sensitivity. The modulation detection threshold (MDT) of a broadband noise amplitude modulated at 10 Hz estimated the y-intercept of the TMTF. The cutoff frequency of the TMTF, measured at a modulation depth 4 dB greater than the MDT, provided an estimate of temporal resolution. MDT was obtained in 27 of 33 infants while both MDT and cutoff frequency was obtained in 15 infants and in 16 of 16 adults. Mean MDT was approximately 10 dB poorer in infants compared to adults. In contrast, mean temporal modulation cutoff frequency did not differ significantly between age groups. These results suggest that temporal resolution is mature, on average, by three months of age in normal hearing children despite immature sensitivity to amplitude modulation. The temporal modulation cutoff frequency approach used here may be a feasible way to examine development of temporal resolution in young listeners with markedly immature sensitivity to amplitude modulation.

Citing Articles

Measuring Speech Discrimination Ability in Sleeping Infants Using fNIRS-A Proof of Principle.

Lee O, Gao D, Peng T, Wunderlich J, Mao D, Balasubramanian G Trends Hear. 2025; 29:23312165241311721.

PMID: 39850978 PMC: 11758514. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241311721.


The impact of spectral and temporal processing on speech recognition in children with cochlear implants.

DeFreese A, Camarata S, Sunderhaus L, Holder J, Berg K, Lighterink M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14094.

PMID: 38890428 PMC: 11189542. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63932-w.


The development of auditory temporal processing during the first year of life.

Cabrera L, Lau B Hearing Balance Commun. 2022; 20(3):155-165.

PMID: 36111124 PMC: 9473293. DOI: 10.1080/21695717.2022.2029092.


Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.

Oster M, Werner L J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 148(1):401.

PMID: 32752747 PMC: 7386947. DOI: 10.1121/10.0001582.

References
1.
Gorga M, Kaminski J, Beauchaine K, Jesteadt W, Neely S . Auditory brainstem responses from children three months to three years of age: normal patterns of response. II. J Speech Hear Res. 1989; 32(2):281-8. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3202.281. View

2.
Bargones J, WERNER L, Marean G . Infant psychometric functions for detection: mechanisms of immature sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 98(1):99-111. DOI: 10.1121/1.414446. View

3.
Won J, Drennan W, Nie K, Jameyson E, Rubinstein J . Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 130(1):376-88. PMC: 3155593. DOI: 10.1121/1.3592521. View

4.
Drennan W, Won J, Nie K, Jameyson E, Rubinstein J . Sensitivity of psychophysical measures to signal processor modifications in cochlear implant users. Hear Res. 2010; 262(1-2):1-8. PMC: 2864608. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.003. View

5.
Goldsworthy R, Delhorne L, Braida L, Reed C . Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners. Trends Amplif. 2013; 17(1):27-44. PMC: 4040862. DOI: 10.1177/1084713813477244. View