» Articles » PMID: 31254095

Predicting a Beneficial Response to Motor Control Training in Patients with Low Back Pain: a Longitudinal Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Jun 30
PMID 31254095
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Exercise therapy such as motor control training (MCT) has been shown to reduce pain and disability in people with low back pain (LBP). It is unknown which patients are most likely to benefit. This longitudinal cohort study aimed to: (1) retrospectively examine records from a large cohort of patients who received MCT treatment, (2) identify potentially important predictors of response to MCT and (3) test the predictors on an independent (split) sample derived from the original cohort of patients, using one group to identify the predictors and the other to test them.

Methods: The response of 775 patients with LBP to MCT was classified as 'improved' or 'not improved' based on self-reported change in pain levels and symptoms. Measures were examined for associations with improvement and entered into a logistic regression model to classify patients as low, medium or high benefits of improvement with MCT. The model was tested on an independent sample.

Results: A positive response was seen in patients with: no evidence of scoliosis [OR  = 4.0, 95% CI (1.7, 9.6)], LBP without associated groin pain [OR = 2.2, 95% CI (1.0, 5.0)], LBP which was chronic recurrent in nature [OR = 3.1, 95% CI (1.8, 5.3)] and poor results on muscle testing of the multifidus muscle [OR = 2.0, 95% CI (1.1, 3.7)]. Testing on an independent sample confirmed that patients could be classified into benefit groups.

Conclusions: This study provides a first step towards assisting clinicians to select patients most likely to respond to MCT. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Citing Articles

Electromyography of the Multifidus Muscle in Horses Trotting During Therapeutic Exercises.

Ursini T, Shaw K, Levine D, Richards J, Adair H Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:844776.

PMID: 35692292 PMC: 9184818. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.844776.


Understanding regional activation of thoraco-lumbar muscles in chronic low back pain and its relationship to clinically relevant domains.

Serafino F, Trucco M, Occhionero A, Luigi Cerone G, Chiarotto A, Vieira T BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):432.

PMID: 33975570 PMC: 8114502. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04287-5.


Motor Control Stabilisation Exercise for Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Prospective Meta-Analysis with Multilevel Meta-Regressions on Intervention Effects.

Niederer D, Engel T, Vogt L, Arampatzis A, Banzer W, Beck H J Clin Med. 2020; 9(9).

PMID: 32971921 PMC: 7564352. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9093058.

References
1.
Searle A, Spink M, Ho A, Chuter V . Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2015; 29(12):1155-67. DOI: 10.1177/0269215515570379. View

2.
Hides J, Donelson R, Lee D, Prather H, Sahrmann S, Hodges P . Convergence and Divergence of Exercise-Based Approaches That Incorporate Motor Control for the Management of Low Back Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019; 49(6):437-452. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8451. View

3.
Hides J, Stanton W, Mendis M, Gildea J, Sexton M . Effect of motor control training on muscle size and football games missed from injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 44(6):1141-9. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318244a321. View

4.
Henschke N, Maher C, Refshauge K, Herbert R, Cumming R, Bleasel J . Characteristics of patients with acute low back pain presenting to primary care in Australia. Clin J Pain. 2009; 25(1):5-11. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181817a8d. View

5.
Hides J, Stanton W, Mendis M, Sexton M . The relationship of transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus clinical muscle tests in patients with chronic low back pain. Man Ther. 2011; 16(6):573-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2011.05.007. View