» Articles » PMID: 31251880

Pitch Shifting With the Commercially Available Eventide Eclipse: Intended and Unintended Changes to the Speech Signal

Overview
Date 2019 Jun 29
PMID 31251880
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose This study details the intended and unintended consequences of pitch shifting with the commercially available Eventide Eclipse. Method Ten vocally healthy participants ( M = 22.0 years; 6 cisgender females, 4 cisgender males) produced a sustained /ɑ/, creating an input signal. This input signal was processed in near real time by the Eventide Eclipse to create an output signal that was either not shifted (0 cents), shifted +100 cents, or shifted -100 cents. Shifts occurred either throughout the entire vocalization or for a 200-ms period after vocal onset. Results Input signals were compared to output signals to examine potential changes. Average pitch-shift magnitudes were within 1 cent of the intended pitch shift. Measured pitch-shift length for intended 200-ms shifts was between 5.9% and 21.7% less than expected, based on the portion of shift selected for measurement. The delay between input and output signals was an average of 11.1 ms. Trials shifted +100 cents had a longer delay than trials shifted -100 or 0 cents. The first 2 formants (F1, F2) shifted in the direction of the pitch shift, with F1 shifting 6.5% and F2 shifting 6.0%. Conclusions The Eventide Eclipse is an accurate pitch-shifting hardware that can be used to explore voice and vocal motor control. The pitch-shifting algorithm shifts all frequencies, resulting in a subsequent change in F1 and F2 during pitch-shifted trials. Researchers using this device should be mindful of stimuli selection to avoid confusion during data interpretation.

Citing Articles

Controlling Pitch for Prosody: Sensorimotor Adaptation in Linguistically Meaningful Contexts.

Dahl K, Cadiz M, Zuk J, Guenther F, Stepp C J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024; 67(2):440-454.

PMID: 38241671 PMC: 11000799. DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00460.


Do Not Cut Off Your Tail: A Mega-Analysis of Responses to Auditory Perturbation Experiments.

Miller H, Kearney E, Nieto-Castanon A, Falsini R, Abur D, Acosta A J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023; 66(11):4315-4331.

PMID: 37850867 PMC: 10715843. DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00315.


Quantitatively characterizing reflexive responses to pitch perturbations.

Kearney E, Nieto-Castanon A, Falsini R, Daliri A, Heller Murray E, Smith D Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:929687.

PMID: 36405080 PMC: 9666385. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.929687.


Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.

Weerathunge H, Voon T, Tardif M, Cilento D, Stepp C Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(7-8):2155-2173.

PMID: 35736994 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06395-7.


Assessing Ecologically Valid Methods of Auditory Feedback Measurement in Individuals With Typical Speech.

Tomassi N, Weerathunge H, Cushman M, Bohland J, Stepp C J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021; 65(1):121-135.

PMID: 34941381 PMC: 9153919. DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00377.


References
1.
Behroozmand R, Liu H, Larson C . Time-dependent neural processing of auditory feedback during voice pitch error detection. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 23(5):1205-17. PMC: 3268676. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21447. View

2.
Scheerer N, Tumber A, Jones J . Attentional demands modulate sensorimotor learning induced by persistent exposure to changes in auditory feedback. J Neurophysiol. 2015; 115(2):826-32. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00799.2015. View

3.
Hillenbrand J, Getty L, Clark M, Wheeler K . Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97(5 Pt 1):3099-111. DOI: 10.1121/1.411872. View

4.
Bauer J, Mittal J, Larson C, Hain T . Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 119(4):2363-71. PMC: 1752220. DOI: 10.1121/1.2173513. View

5.
Mollaei F, Shiller D, Baum S, Gracco V . Sensorimotor control of vocal pitch and formant frequencies in Parkinson's disease. Brain Res. 2016; 1646:269-277. PMC: 4975987. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.06.013. View