» Articles » PMID: 31250396

Predictors of Short-term Readmission After Beyond Total Mesorectal Excision for Primary Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Updates Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2019 Jun 29
PMID 31250396
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unplanned readmissions heavily affect the cost of health care and are used as an indicator of performance. No clear data are available regarding beyond-total mesorectal excision (bTME) procedure. Aim of the study is to identify patient-related and surgery-related factors influencing the 30-day readmissions after bTME. Retrospective data were collected from 220 patients who underwent bTME procedures at single centre between 2006 and 2016. Patient-related and operative factors were assessed, including body mass index (BMI), age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) score, preoperative stage, neo-adjuvant therapy, primary tumour vs recurrence, the extent of surgery. The readmission rate was 8.18%. No statistically significant association was found with BMI, ASA score, length of stay and stay in the intensive care unit, primary vs recurrent tumour or blood transfusions. Not quite statistically significant was the association with pelvic side wall dissection (OR 3.32, p = 0.054). Statistically significant factors included preoperative stage > IIIb (OR: 4.77, p = 0.002), neo-adjuvant therapy (OR: 0.13, p = 0.0006), age over 65 years (OR: 5.96, p = 0.0005), any re-intervention during the first admission (OR: 7.4, p = 0.0001), and any post-operative complication (OR: 9.01, p = 0.004). The readmission rate after beyond-TME procedure is influenced by patient-related factors as well as post-operative morbidity.

Citing Articles

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer Patients after beyond Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery: A Feasibility Study.

Nordkamp S, Creemers D, Glazemakers S, Ketelaers S, Scholten H, van de Calseijde S Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760492 PMC: 10526990. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184523.

References
1.
. Body mass index and complications following major gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective, international cohort study and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2018; 20(8):O215-O225. DOI: 10.1111/codi.14292. View

2.
Pucciarelli S, Zorzi M, Gennaro N, Gagliardi G, Restivo A, Saugo M . In-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of hospital stay after surgery for primary colorectal cancer: A national population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43(7):1312-1323. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.03.003. View

3.
Selvaggi F, Fucini C, Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Maretto I, Mondi I . Outcome and prognostic factors of local recurrent rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 150 patients. Tech Coloproctol. 2014; 19(3):135-44. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1241-x. View

4.
Verlaan J, Kuperus J, Slooff W, Hennipman A, Oner F . Complications, secondary interventions and long term morbidity after en bloc sacrectomy. Eur Spine J. 2014; 24(10):2209-19. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3729-5. View

5.
Platt E, Dovell G, Smolarek S . Systematic review of outcomes following pelvic exenteration for the treatment of primary and recurrent locally advanced rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2018; 22(11):835-845. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1883-1. View