» Articles » PMID: 31244513

Scaling the Poisson GLM to Massive Neural Datasets Through Polynomial Approximations

Overview
Date 2019 Jun 28
PMID 31244513
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent advances in recording technologies have allowed neuroscientists to record simultaneous spiking activity from hundreds to thousands of neurons in multiple brain regions. Such large-scale recordings pose a major challenge to existing statistical methods for neural data analysis. Here we develop highly scalable approximate inference methods for Poisson generalized linear models (GLMs) that require only a single pass over the data. Our approach relies on a recently proposed method for obtaining approximate sufficient statistics for GLMs using polynomial approximations [7], which we adapt to the Poisson GLM setting. We focus on inference using quadratic approximations to nonlinear terms in the Poisson GLM log-likelihood with Gaussian priors, for which we derive closed-form solutions to the approximate maximum likelihood and MAP estimates, posterior distribution, and marginal likelihood. We introduce an adaptive procedure to select the polynomial approximation interval and show that the resulting method allows for efficient and accurate inference and regularization of high-dimensional parameters. We use the quadratic estimator to fit a fully-coupled Poisson GLM to spike train data recorded from 831 neurons across five regions of the mouse brain for a duration of 41 minutes, binned at 1 ms resolution. Across all neurons, this model is fit to over 2 billion spike count bins and identifies fine-timescale statistical dependencies between neurons within and across cortical and subcortical areas.

Citing Articles

Approximate maximum likelihood estimation in cure models using aggregated data, with application to HPV vaccine completion.

Rice J, Kempe A Stat Med. 2024; 43(25):4872-4886.

PMID: 39235316 PMC: 11486596. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10174.


Time-varying generalized linear models: characterizing and decoding neuronal dynamics in higher visual areas.

Weng G, Clark K, Akbarian A, Noudoost B, Nategh N Front Comput Neurosci. 2024; 18:1273053.

PMID: 38348287 PMC: 10859875. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1273053.


Identification of interacting neural populations: methods and statistical considerations.

Kass R, Bong H, Olarinre M, Xin Q, Urban K J Neurophysiol. 2023; 130(3):475-496.

PMID: 37465897 PMC: 10642974. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00131.2023.


Integrating Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Neural Classification.

Sarmashghi M, Jadhav S, Eden U IEEE Access. 2023; 10:119106-119118.

PMID: 37223667 PMC: 10205093. DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3221436.


Low-dimensional encoding of decisions in parietal cortex reflects long-term training history.

Latimer K, Freedman D Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):1010.

PMID: 36823109 PMC: 9950136. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36554-5.


References
1.
Jun J, Steinmetz N, Siegle J, Denman D, Bauza M, Barbarits B . Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity. Nature. 2017; 551(7679):232-236. PMC: 5955206. DOI: 10.1038/nature24636. View

2.
Paninski L . Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models. Network. 2004; 15(4):243-62. View

3.
Park I, Meister M, Huk A, Pillow J . Encoding and decoding in parietal cortex during sensorimotor decision-making. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(10):1395-403. PMC: 4176983. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3800. View

4.
Pillow J, Shlens J, Paninski L, Sher A, Litke A, Chichilnisky E . Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population. Nature. 2008; 454(7207):995-9. PMC: 2684455. DOI: 10.1038/nature07140. View

5.
Rahnama Rad K, Paninski L . Efficient, adaptive estimation of two-dimensional firing rate surfaces via Gaussian process methods. Network. 2010; 21(3-4):142-68. DOI: 10.3109/0954898X.2010.532288. View