» Articles » PMID: 31243484

Corticospinal Excitability of Tibialis Anterior and Soleus Differs During Passive Ankle Movement

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Jun 28
PMID 31243484
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess corticospinal excitability of soleus (SOL) and tibialis anterior (TA) at a segmental level during passive ankle movement. Four experimental components were performed to assess the effects of passive ankle movement and muscle length on corticospinal excitability (MEP/M) at different muscle lengths, subcortical excitability at the level of lumbar spinal segments (LEP/M), intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (ICF), and H-reflex in SOL and TA. In addition, the degree of fascicle length changes between SOL and TA was assessed in a subpopulation during passive ankle movement. Fascicles shortened and lengthened with joint movement during passive shortening and lengthening of SOL and TA to a similar degree (p < 0.001). Resting motor threshold was greater in SOL compared to TA (p ≤ 0.014). MEP/M was facilitated in TA during passive shortening relative to the static position (p ≤ 0.023) and passive lengthening (p ≤ 0.001), but remained similar during passive ankle movement in SOL (p ≥ 0.497), regardless of muscle length at the point of stimulus (p = 0.922). LEP/M (SOL: p = 0.075, TA: p = 0.071), SICI (SOL: p = 0.427, TA: p = 0.540), and ICF (SOL: p = 0.177, TA: p = 0.777) remained similar during passive ankle movement. H-reflex was not different across conditions in TA (p = 0.258), but was reduced during passive lengthening compared to shortening in SOL (p = 0.048). These results suggest a differential modulation of corticospinal excitability between plantar and dorsiflexors during passive movement. The corticospinal behaviour observed might be mediated by an increase in corticospinal drive as a result of reduced afferent input during muscle shortening and appears to be flexor-biased.

Citing Articles

Corticospinal and spinal responses following a single session of lower limb motor skill and resistance training.

Woodhead A, Rainer C, Hill J, Murphy C, North J, Kidgell D Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(8):2401-2416.

PMID: 38532177 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05464-9.


Corticospinal excitability across lower limb muscles in humans.

Eisner-Janowicz I, Chen B, Sangari S, Perez M J Neurophysiol. 2023; 130(3):788-797.

PMID: 37435645 PMC: 10648929. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00207.2023.


Enhanced corticospinal excitability in the tibialis anterior during static stretching of the soleus in young healthy individuals.

Budini F, Christova M PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284289.

PMID: 37040389 PMC: 10089312. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284289.


Decoding firings of a large population of human motor units from high-density surface electromyogram in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Skarabot J, Ammann C, Balshaw T, Divjak M, Urh F, Murks N J Physiol. 2023; 601(10):1719-1744.

PMID: 36946417 PMC: 10952962. DOI: 10.1113/JP284043.


The Effect of Resistance Training on Motor Unit Firing Properties: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Elgueta-Cancino E, Evans E, Martinez-Valdes E, Falla D Front Physiol. 2022; 13:817631.

PMID: 35295567 PMC: 8918924. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.817631.


References
1.
Morgan D, Whitehead N, Wise A, GREGORY J, Proske U . Tension changes in the cat soleus muscle following slow stretch or shortening of the contracting muscle. J Physiol. 2000; 522 Pt 3:503-13. PMC: 2269772. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-2-00503.x. View

2.
Morita H, Olivier E, Baumgarten J, Petersen N, Christensen L, Nielsen J . Differential changes in corticospinal and Ia input to tibialis anterior and soleus motor neurones during voluntary contraction in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 2000; 170(1):65-76. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-201x.2000.00762.x. View

3.
Hermens H, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G . Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000; 10(5):361-74. DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4. View

4.
Han T, Kim J, Lim J . Optimization of facilitation related to threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(4):593-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00471-0. View

5.
Keel J, Smith M, Wassermann E . A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(4):720. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00518-6. View