» Articles » PMID: 31238375

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gallbladder Drainage Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for High Risk Surgical Patients with Acute Cholecystitis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Endoscopy
Date 2019 Jun 26
PMID 31238375
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recent evidence suggests that endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an effective and safe alternative to percutaneous drainage (PT-GBD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these two procedures in high risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis.

Methods: A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted for all articles published up to October 2017 to identify comparative studies between EUS-GBD and PT-GBD. A meta-analysis was performed on outcomes including technical success, clinical success, post-procedure adverse events, length of hospital stay, unplanned hospital readmission, need for reintervention, recurrent cholecystitis, and disease- or treatment-related mortality for these two procedures.

Results: Five comparative studies (206 patients in the EUS-GBD group vs. 289 patients in the PT-GBD group), were included in the final analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in technical success (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.12 to 1.58;  = 0.21;  = 0 %) and clinical success (OR 1.07, 95 %CI 0.36 to 3.16;  = 0.90;  = 44 %) between the two procedures. EUS-GBD had fewer adverse events than PT-GBD (OR 0.43, 95 %CI 0.18 to 1.00;  = 0.05;  = 66 %). Moreover, patients undergoing EUS-GBD had shorter hospital stays, with pooled standard mean difference of - 2.53 (95 %CI - 4.28 to - 0.78;  = 0.005;  = 98 %), and required significantly fewer reinterventions (OR 0.16, 95 %CI 0.04 to 0.042; 0.001;  = 32 %) resulting in significantly fewer unplanned readmissions (OR 0.16, 95 %CI 0.05 to 0.53;  = 0.003;  = 79 %).

Conclusions: EUS-GBD was associated with lower rates of post-procedure adverse events, shorter hospital stays, and fewer reinterventions and readmissions compared with PT-GBD in patients with acute cholecystitis who were unfit for surgery.

Citing Articles

US multicenter outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents for acute cholecystitis.

David Y, Kakked G, Confer B, Shah R, Khara H, Diehl D Endosc Int Open. 2025; 13:a24955542.

PMID: 39958659 PMC: 11827723. DOI: 10.1055/a-2495-5542.


Percutaneous endoscopy-guided gallbladder lumen-apposing metal stent retrieval, lithotripsy, and cholecystoduodenal stenting in a patient with acute cholecystitis.

Shafi S, Husnain A, Riaz A Radiol Case Rep. 2025; 20(4):1844-1849.

PMID: 39897760 PMC: 11783214. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.12.019.


A review of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage and gastroenterostomy: assisted approaches and comparison with alternative techniques.

Xu R, Zhang K, Guo J, Sun S Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024; 17:17562848241299755.

PMID: 39635228 PMC: 11615986. DOI: 10.1177/17562848241299755.


Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.

Fok J, Teoh A, Chan S Dig Endosc. 2024; 37(1):93-102.

PMID: 39552245 PMC: 11718140. DOI: 10.1111/den.14946.


A stent of strength: use of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for biliary pathologies and other novel applications.

Goldman I, Ji K, Scheinfeld M, Hajifathalian K, Morgan M, Yang J Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(2):902-915.

PMID: 39251417 PMC: 11794341. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04561-9.