» Articles » PMID: 31236822

Tracking the Implicit Acquisition of Nonadjacent Transitional Probabilities by ERPs

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2019 Jun 26
PMID 31236822
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The implicit acquisition of complex probabilistic regularities has been found to be crucial in numerous automatized cognitive abilities, including language processing and associative learning. However, it has not been completely elucidated how the implicit extraction of second-order nonadjacent transitional probabilities is reflected by neurophysiological processes. Therefore, this study investigated the sensitivity of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to these probabilistic regularities embedded in a sequence of visual stimuli without providing explicit information on the structure of the stimulus stream. Healthy young adults (N = 32) performed a four-choice RT task that included a sequential regularity between nonadjacent trials yielding a complex transitional probability structure. ERPs were measured relative to both stimulus and response onset. RTs indicated the rapid acquisition of the sequential regularity and the transitional probabilities. The acquisition process was also tracked by the stimulus-locked and response-locked P3 component: The P3 peak was larger for the sequence than for the random stimuli, while the late P3 was larger for less probable than for more probable short-range relations among the random stimuli. According to the RT and P3 effects, sensitivity to the sequential regularity is assumed to be supported by the initial sensitivity to the transitional probabilities. These results suggest that stimulus-response contingencies on the probabilistic regularities of the ongoing stimulus context are implicitly mapped and constantly revised. Overall, this study (1) highlights the role of predictive processes during implicit memory formation, and (2) delineates a potential to gain further insight into the dynamics of implicit acquisition processes.

Citing Articles

Mind wandering enhances statistical learning.

Vekony T, Farkas B, Brezoczki B, Mittner M, Csifcsak G, Simor P iScience. 2025; 28(2):111703.

PMID: 39906558 PMC: 11791256. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111703.


Neural representations of statistical and rule-based predictions in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.

Takacs A, Toth-Faber E, Schubert L, Tarnok Z, Ghorbani F, Trelenberg M Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(8):e26719.

PMID: 38826009 PMC: 11144952. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26719.


A neurophysiological perspective on the integration between incidental learning and cognitive control.

Takacs A, Beste C Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):329.

PMID: 36973381 PMC: 10042851. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04692-7.


Modality-specific and modality-independent neural representations work in concert in predictive processes during sequence learning.

Vekony T, Takacs A, Pedraza F, Haesebaert F, Tillmann B, Mihalecz I Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(12):7783-7796.

PMID: 36944531 PMC: 10267633. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad079.


The complexity of measuring reliability in learning tasks: An illustration using the Alternating Serial Reaction Time Task.

Farkas B, Krajcsi A, Janacsek K, Nemeth D Behav Res Methods. 2023; 56(1):301-317.

PMID: 36604378 PMC: 10794483. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-02038-5.


References
1.
Baldwin K, Kutas M . An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. Psychophysiology. 1997; 34(1):74-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02418.x. View

2.
Howard D, Howard Jr J, Japikse K, Diyanni C, Thompson A, Somberg R . Implicit sequence learning: effects of level of structure, adult age, and extended practice. Psychol Aging. 2004; 19(1):79-92. PMC: 1224741. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.79. View

3.
Soetens E, Notebaert W . Response monitoring and expectancy in random serial RT tasks. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005; 119(2):189-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.01.003. View

4.
Fogelson N, Fernandez-Del-Olmo M . Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e65914. PMC: 3681826. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065914. View

5.
Destrebecqz A, Cleeremans A . Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001; 8(2):343-50. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196171. View