» Articles » PMID: 31232831

Effect of Postactivation Potentiation After Medium Vs. High Inertia Eccentric Overload Exercise on Standing Long Jump, Countermovement Jump, and Change of Direction Performance

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2019 Jun 25
PMID 31232831
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Beato, M, De Keijzer, KL, Leskauskas, Z, Allen, WJ, Dello Iacono, A, and McErlain-Naylor, SA. Effect of postactivation potentiation after medium vs. high inertia eccentric overload exercise on standing long jump, countermovement jump, and change of direction performance. J Strength Cond Res 35(9): 2616-2621, 2021-This study aimed to evaluate the postactivation potentiation (PAP) effects of an eccentric overload (EOL) exercise on vertical and horizontal jumps and change of direction (COD) performance. Twelve healthy physically active male subjects were involved in a crossover study. The subjects performed 3 sets of 6 repetitions of EOL half squats for maximal power using a flywheel ergometer. Postactivation potentiation using an EOL exercise was compared between a medium (M-EOL) vs. high inertia (H-EOL) experimental condition. Long jump (LJ) was recorded at 30 seconds, 3, and 6 minutes after both EOL exercises and compared with baseline values (control). The same procedure was used to assess countermovement jump (CMJ) height and peak power and 5-m COD test (COD-5m). A fully Bayesian statistical approach to provide probabilistic statements was used in this study. Long jump performance reported improvements after M-EOL and H-EOL exercise (Bayes factor [BF10] = 32.7, strong; BF10 = 9.2, moderate), respectively. Countermovement jump height (BF10 = 135.6, extreme; BF10 > 200, extreme), CMJ peak power (BF10 > 200, extreme; BF10 = 56.1, very strong), and COD-5m (BF10 = 55.7, very strong; BF10 = 16.4, strong) reported improvements after M-EOL and H-EOL exercise, respectively. Between analysis did not report meaningful differences in performance between M-EOL and H-EOL exercises. The present outcomes highlight that PAP using an EOL (M-EOL and H-EOL) improves LJ, CMJ height, CMJ peak power, and COD-5m in male athletes. The optimal time window for the PAP effect was found for both EOL conditions from 3 to 6 minutes. However, M-EOL and H-EOL produce similar PAP effect on LJ, CMJ, and COD-5m tasks.

Citing Articles

Comparison of six-week flywheel and traditional resistance training on deceleration and dynamic balance in elite badminton players.

Yuan S, Lu Z, Tan S, Zhang Z, Jing S, Liu H Front Physiol. 2025; 16:1491661.

PMID: 40070459 PMC: 11893587. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1491661.


Acute Effects of Low vs. High Inertia During Flywheel Deadlifts with Equal Force Impulse on Vertical Jump Performance.

Tsoukos A, Tsoukala M, Papadimitriou D, Terzis G, Bogdanis G Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).

PMID: 40006353 PMC: 11858857. DOI: 10.3390/s25041125.


Heavier loads in flywheel exercise induce greater post-activation performance enhancement in countermovement jumps compared to heavy Smith machine squats in males.

Shi J, Yan B, Yu M, Wang Z, Wang Y, Liu H Biol Sport. 2024; 41(4):231-240.

PMID: 39416499 PMC: 11475006. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.139075.


Acute effects of eccentric overload training with different loading doses in male sprinters.

Liu Y, Zhang J, Hu Z, Zhong Z, Yuan X Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e32369.

PMID: 38947482 PMC: 11214358. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32369.


The effect of flywheel complex training with eccentric-overload on muscular adaptation in elite female volleyball players.

Wang J, Zhang Q, Chen W, Fu H, Zhang M, Fan Y PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17079.

PMID: 38525282 PMC: 10961060. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17079.