» Articles » PMID: 31228175

"Smartphone Medication Adherence Saves Kidneys" for Kidney Transplantation Recipients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal JMIR Res Protoc
Publisher JMIR Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Jun 23
PMID 31228175
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Kidney transplant recipients' poor medication adherence and poor control of comorbidities, particularly hypertension, are risk factors for graft rejection, graft loss, and death. Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been successful in improving sustained medication adherence and blood pressure control among kidney transplantation recipients. We provide rationale for an RCT evaluating a mobile health medical self-management system for kidney transplantation recipients called Smartphone Medication Adherence Saves Kidneys (SMASK).

Objective: Our objective is to determine whether SMASK is efficacious in improving medication adherence and sustaining blood pressure control among kidney transplantation recipients with uncontrolled hypertension and poor medication adherence compared to an enhanced standard care.

Methods: This two-arm, 6-month, phase II single-site efficacy RCT will involve 80 kidney transplantation recipients. Participants will be randomly assigned to the SMASK intervention arm or control arm. SMASK includes multilevel components: automated reminders from an electronic medication tray; tailored text messages and motivational feedback, guided by the self-determination theory; and automated summary reports for providers. Evaluations will be conducted preintervention, at 3 and 6 months, and posttrial at 12 months. Specific aims are to test the hypotheses that compared to standard care, the SMASK cohort will demonstrate significantly improved changes at 3, 6, and 12 months in the primary outcome variables medication adherence (proportion with electronic monitor-derived score >0.90) and blood pressure control (proportion meeting and sustaining adherence to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes [KDIGO] guidelines for blood pressure control); the secondary outcome variables provider adherence to KDIGO guidelines, measured by timing of medication changes and changes in self-determination theory constructs; and the exploratory outcome variables estimated glomerular filtration rate, variability in calcineurin inhibitor trough levels, and proportion of patients meeting and sustaining the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure below 130/80 mm Hg. After the 6-month evaluation, interviews with a random sample of SMASK subjects (n=20) and health care providers (n=3-5) will assess user reactions including acceptability, usability, and aids/barriers to sustainability. Data from the RCT and interviews will be triangulated to further refine and optimize SMASK and prepare for a multisite effectiveness RCT.

Results: The SMASK project received funding from National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases in June 2016, obtained institutional review board approval in April 2016, and began data collection in July 2016. As of July 2018, we completed enrollment with a total of 80 participants.

Conclusions: This study will provide data regarding the efficacy of SMASK to improve medication adherence and blood pressure control in a cohort of hypertensive kidney transplant recipients. An efficacious SMASK intervention will pave the way for a larger, multicenter, effectiveness RCT powered sufficiently to evaluate clinical events in a real-world setting and with the potential to demonstrate improved outcomes at lower cost than standard care.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/13351.

Citing Articles

A systematic review on eHealth technology personalization approaches.

Ten Klooster I, Kip H, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Crutzen R, Kelders S iScience. 2024; 27(9):110771.

PMID: 39290843 PMC: 11406103. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110771.


Overcoming Low Adherence to Chronic Medications by Improving their Effectiveness using a Personalized Second-generation Digital System.

Bayatra A, Nasserat R, Ilan Y Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2024; 25(16):2078-2088.

PMID: 38288794 DOI: 10.2174/0113892010269461240110060035.


Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence in solid organ transplant recipients.

Mellon L, Doyle F, Hickey A, Ward K, de Freitas D, McCormick P Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 9:CD012854.

PMID: 36094829 PMC: 9466987. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012854.pub2.


Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future.

Fleming J, Pollock M, Taber D, McGillicuddy J, Diamantidis C, Docherty S Transplant Direct. 2022; 8(3):e1298.

PMID: 35368987 PMC: 8966961. DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001298.


Effectiveness of mobile health-based self-management application for posttransplant cares: A systematic review.

Abasi S, Yazdani A, Kiani S, Mahmoudzadeh-Sagheb Z Health Sci Rep. 2021; 4(4):e434.

PMID: 34869915 PMC: 8596943. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.434.


References
1.
Wolfe R, Ashby V, Milford E, Ojo A, Ettenger R, Agodoa L . Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(23):1725-30. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199912023412303. View

2.
Rogoza A, Pavlova T, Sergeeva M . Validation of A&D UA-767 device for the self-measurement of blood pressure. Blood Press Monit. 2000; 5(4):227-31. DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200008000-00006. View

3.
Chisholm M, Vollenweider L, Mulloy L, Jagadeesan M, Wynn J, Rogers H . Renal transplant patient compliance with free immunosuppressive medications. Transplantation. 2000; 70(8):1240-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200010270-00020. View

4.
Demiris G, Speedie S, Finkelstein S . A questionnaire for the assessment of patients' impressions of the risks and benefits of home telecare. J Telemed Telecare. 2000; 6(5):278-84. DOI: 10.1258/1357633001935914. View

5.
Ryan R, Deci E . Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2001; 55(1):68-78. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68. View