» Articles » PMID: 31223591

Evaluation of Sub CutaneousRush Immunotherapy Effectiveness in Perennial Allergic Rhinitis After a Year from Treatment

Overview
Date 2019 Jun 22
PMID 31223591
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Allergen immunotherapy is an effective treatment for allergic rhinitis. Conventional immunotherapy takes at least 5 to 6 months to reach the maintenance dosage; nonetheless, rush immunotherapy accelerates to reach the maintenance dose several months earlier. However, the safety and efficacy of this treatment has not been widely investigated. The objective of the present study was to determine the efficacy of subcutaneous rush immunotherapy in the patients with perennial allergic rhinitis after a year from treatment.

Materials And Methods: This study was carried out on a total of 15 patients with allergic rhinitis who received rush immunotherapy and were evaluated for the quality of life and clinical symptoms improvement with Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Questionnaire (SNOT-22) and Mini Rhino conjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) before and after a year from treatment. Moreover, specific weed mix Immunoglobulin E (IgE) was measured before and after a year from treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 16) (P<0.05).

Results: The comparison of specific IgE indicated a significant reduction between before and after a year from treatment (P=0.005for pigweed)(P=0.022 for salsola). There was a significant decrease in clinical symptoms according to SNOT-22 Questionnaire [(mean score: 46.00, before the treatment) and (mean score: 14.06, after the treatment)]. The quality of life for most of the patients was moderate (46.7%) before the treatment and good (80%) after the treatment, which was considered statistically significant (P>0.001).

Conclusion: Rush immunotherapy is an effective treatment in the patients with allergic rhinitis. It seems to be an alternative treatment in cases that need more rapid treatment. However, it is recommended to carry out other studies on the control group.

Citing Articles

Breaking the mold: nontraditional approaches to allergen immunotherapy for environmental allergens.

Ramchandani R, Lucyshyn R, Linton S, Ellis A Immunotherapy. 2024; 16(18-19):1153-1169.

PMID: 39382452 PMC: 11633400. DOI: 10.1080/1750743X.2024.2408216.


Topical cyclosporine versus allergen specific immunotherapy in perennial allergic conjunctivitis.

Dogan C, Tuzer C, Turker I, Alkan A, Culha D, Demir S Int Ophthalmol. 2022; 43(7):2161-2169.

PMID: 36513916 PMC: 9747541. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02612-y.

References
1.
Dursun A, Sin B, Oner F, Misirligil Z . The safety of allergen immunotherapy (IT) in Turkey. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006; 16(2):123-8. View

2.
Sheikh A, Hurwitz B, Shehata Y . House dust mite avoidance measures for perennial allergic rhinitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (1):CD001563. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001563.pub2. View

3.
Bruggenjurgen B, Reinhold T, Brehler R, Laake E, Wiese G, Machate U . Cost-effectiveness of specific subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008; 101(3):316-24. DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60498-X. View

4.
Zhang L, Han D, Huang D, Wu Y, Dong Z, Xu G . Prevalence of self-reported allergic rhinitis in eleven major cities in china. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2008; 149(1):47-57. DOI: 10.1159/000176306. View

5.
Cox L, Calderon M . Subcutaneous specific immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a review of treatment practices in the US and Europe. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010; 26(12):2723-33. DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.528647. View