» Articles » PMID: 31223119

The Potential of Blockchain Technology for Health Information Exchange: Experimental Study From Patients' Perspectives

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2019 Jun 22
PMID 31223119
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nowadays, a number of mechanisms and tools are being used by health care organizations and physicians to electronically exchange the personal health information of patients. The main objectives of different methods of health information exchange (HIE) are to reduce health care costs, minimize medical errors, and improve the coordination of interorganizational information exchange across health care entities. The main challenges associated with the common HIE systems are privacy concerns, security risks, low visibility of system transparency, and lack of patient control. Blockchain technology is likely to disrupt the current information exchange models utilized in the health care industry.

Objective: Little is known about patients' perceptions and attitudes toward the implementation of blockchain-enabled HIE networks, and it is still not clear if patients (as one of the main HIE stakeholders) are likely to opt in to the applications of this technology in HIE initiatives. Thus, this study aimed at exploring the core value of blockchain technology in the health care industry from health care consumers' views.

Methods: To recognize the potential applications of blockchain technology in health care practices, we designed 16 information exchange scenarios for controlled Web-based experiments. Overall, 2013 respondents participated in 16 Web-based experiments. Each experiment described an information exchange condition characterized by 4 exchange mechanisms (ie, direct, lookup, patient-centered, and blockchain), 2 types of health information (ie, sensitive vs nonsensitive), and 2 types of privacy policy (weak vs strong).

Results: The findings show that there are significant differences in patients' perceptions of various exchange mechanisms with regard to patient privacy concern, trust in competency and integrity, opt-in intention, and willingness to share information. Interestingly, participants hold a favorable attitude toward the implementation of blockchain-based exchange mechanisms for privacy protection, coordination, and information exchange purposes. This study proposed the potentials and limitations of a blockchain-based attempt in the HIE context.

Conclusions: The results of this research should be of interest to both academics and practitioners. The findings propose potential limitations of a blockchain-based HIE that should be addressed by health care organizations to exchange personal health information in a secure and private manner. This study can contribute to the research in the blockchain area and enrich the literature on the use of blockchain in HIE efforts. Practitioners can also identify how to leverage the benefit of blockchain to promote HIE initiatives nationwide.

Citing Articles

Privacy-Enhancing Technologies in Biomedical Data Science.

Cho H, Froelicher D, Dokmai N, Nandi A, Sadhuka S, Hong M Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2024; 7(1):317-343.

PMID: 39178425 PMC: 11346580. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-120423-120107.


Biomedical blockchain with practical implementations and quantitative evaluations: a systematic review.

Lacson R, Yu Y, Kuo T, Ohno-Machado L J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 31(6):1423-1435.

PMID: 38726710 PMC: 11105130. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae084.


Searchable Blockchain-Based Healthcare Information Exchange System to Enhance Privacy Preserving and Data Usability.

Lee S, Kim Y, Cho S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(5).

PMID: 38475119 PMC: 10935374. DOI: 10.3390/s24051582.


Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.

Baines R, Stevens S, Austin D, Anil K, Bradwell H, Cooper L J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50421.

PMID: 38441944 PMC: 10951832. DOI: 10.2196/50421.


Identifying the Barriers to Acceptance of Blockchain-Based Patient-Centric Data Management Systems in Healthcare.

Mutambik I, Lee J, Almuqrin A, Alharbi Z Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38338229 PMC: 10855174. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030345.


References
1.
Rudin R, Volk L, Simon S, Bates D . What Affects Clinicians' Usage of Health Information Exchange?. Appl Clin Inform. 2011; 2(3):250-262. PMC: 3237190. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2011-03-RA-0021. View

2.
Wang J, Ho H, Chen J, Chai S, Tai C, Chen Y . Attitudes toward inter-hospital electronic patient record exchange: discrepancies among physicians, medical record staff, and patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:264. PMC: 4499194. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0896-y. View

3.
Tripathi M, Delano D, Lund B, Rudolph L . Engaging patients for health information exchange. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009; 28(2):435-43. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.435. View

4.
Patel V, Dhopeshwarkar R, Edwards A, Barron Y, Sparenborg J, Kaushal R . Consumer support for health information exchange and personal health records: a regional health information organization survey. J Med Syst. 2010; 36(3):1043-52. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9566-0. View

5.
Esmaeilzadeh P, Mirzaei T . Comparison of consumers' perspectives on different health information exchange (HIE) mechanisms: an experimental study. Int J Med Inform. 2018; 119:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.08.007. View