» Articles » PMID: 31217343

One-Day Versus Three-Day Dexamethasone in Combination with Palonosetron for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data-Based Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Jun 21
PMID 31217343
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A dexamethasone-sparing regimen consisting of palonosetron plus 1-day dexamethasone for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) has been studied previously. Here, we evaluate the noninferiority of the dexamethasone-sparing regimen in overall antiemetic control using a meta-analysis based on individual patient data (IPD).

Materials And Methods: We conducted a systematic review for randomized trials reporting CINV outcomes for the comparison of palonosetron plus 1-day dexamethasone (d1 arm) versus the same regimen followed by dexamethasone on days 2-3 after chemotherapy (d3 arm) in chemotherapy-naïve adult patients undergoing either moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)-containing chemotherapy. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched electronically. A manual search was also conducted. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication) in the overall 5-day study period. The noninferiority margin was set at -8.0% (d1 arm-d3 arm).

Results: Five studies ( = 1,194) were eligible for analysis and all IPD was collected. In the overall study period, the d1 arm showed noninferiority to the d3 arm for CR as well as complete control (pooled risk difference in CR rate - 1.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.1 to 4.0%, I = 0%; in complete control rate - 2.4%, 95% CI -7.7 to 2.9%, I = 0%). There was no significant interaction between dexamethasone regimen and risk factors (type of chemotherapy, sex, age, and alcohol consumption).

Conclusion: This IPD meta-analysis indicates that the dexamethasone-sparing regimen is not associated with a significant loss in overall antiemetic control in patients undergoing MEC or AC-containing chemotherapy, irrespective of known risk factors for CINV.

Implications For Practice: Although dexamethasone in combination with other antiemetic agents has been used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), it is of clinical importance to minimize total dose of dexamethasone in patients undergoing multiple cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy. This individual-patient-data meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trials (1,194 patients) demonstrated a noninferiority of the dexamethasone-sparing regimen for complete response and complete control of CINV. The outcomes were comparable across patients with different characteristics. These findings thus help physicians minimize use of the steroid and further reduce the burden of dexamethasone-related side effects in patients undergoing multiple consecutive courses of emetogenic chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone sparing for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis 2023 from Japan Society....

Nakashima K, Yokomizo A, Murakami M, Okita K, Wada M, Iino K Int J Clin Oncol. 2024; 29(12):1785-1794.

PMID: 39417943 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02643-8.


Dexamethasone-sparing strategies in anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy with a focus on 5-HT3 receptor antagonists: a network meta-analysis.

Watanabe D, Iihara H, Kobayashi R, Fujii H, Mori R, Kumada K Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1414037.

PMID: 39132500 PMC: 11310115. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1414037.


2023 MASCC and ESMO guideline update for the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Herrstedt J, Clark-Snow R, Ruhlmann C, Molassiotis A, Olver I, Rapoport B ESMO Open. 2024; 9(2):102195.

PMID: 38458657 PMC: 10937211. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102195.


Characteristics of nausea and its impact on health-related quality of life in cisplatin-treated patients receiving dexamethasone-sparing prophylaxis: an analysis of the LUNG-NEPA study.

Celio L, Aapro M Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(3):204.

PMID: 38433125 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08406-5.


2023 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: prevention of nausea and vomiting following high-emetic-risk antineoplastic agents.

Herrstedt J, Celio L, Hesketh P, Zhang L, Navari R, Chan A Support Care Cancer. 2023; 32(1):47.

PMID: 38127246 PMC: 10739516. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08221-4.


References
1.
Lindley C, Hirsch J, ONeill C, Transau M, GILBERT C, Osterhaus J . Quality of life consequences of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Qual Life Res. 1992; 1(5):331-40. DOI: 10.1007/BF00434947. View

2.
Aapro M, Fabi A, Nole F, Medici M, Steger G, Bachmann C . Double-blind, randomised, controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for 1 day with or without dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic.... Ann Oncol. 2010; 21(5):1083-8. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp584. View

3.
Berger M, Ettinger D, Aston J, Barbour S, Bergsbaken J, Bierman P . NCCN Guidelines Insights: Antiemesis, Version 2.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017; 15(7):883-893. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0117. View

4.
Basch E, Prestrud A, Hesketh P, Kris M, Feyer P, Somerfield M . Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(31):4189-98. PMC: 4876353. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4614. View

5.
Decker G, DeMeyer E, Kisko D . Measuring the maintenance of daily life activities using the functional living index-emesis (FLIE) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Support Oncol. 2006; 4(1):35-41, 52. View