» Articles » PMID: 31217036

Non-mono-exponential Diffusion Models for Assessing Early Response of Liver Metastases to Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancer Imaging
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2019 Jun 21
PMID 31217036
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Preoperative chemotherapy is becoming standard therapy for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer, so early assessment of treatment response is crucial to make a reasonable therapeutic regimen and avoid overtreatment, especially for patients with severe side effects. The role of three non-mono-exponential diffusion models, such as the kurtosis model, the stretched exponential model and the statistical model, were explored in this study to early assess the response to chemotherapy in patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer.

Methods: Thirty-three patients diagnosed as colorectal liver metastasis were evaluated in this study. Diffusion-weighted images with b values (0, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 s/mm) were acquired at 3.0 T. The parameters (ADC, K, DDC,α, D and σ) were derived from three non-mono-exponential models (the kurtosis, stretched exponential and statistical models) as well as their corresponding percentage changes before and after chemotherapy. The difference in above parameters between the response and non-response groups were analyzed with independent-samples T-test (normality) and Mann-Whitney U-test (non-normality). Meanwhile, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the response to chemotherapy.

Results: Significantly lower values of K (the kurtosis coefficient derived from the kurtosis model) and σ (the width of diffusion coefficient distribution in the statistical model) (P < 0.05) were observed in the respond group before treatment, as well as higher ΔK and Δσ values (P < 0.05) after the first cycle of chemotherapy were also found compared with the non-respond group. ROC analyses showed the K value acquired before treatment had the highest diagnostic performance (0.746) in distinguishing responders from non-responders. Furthermore, the high sensitivity (100%) and accuracy (76.3%) from the K value before treatment was found in assessing the response of colorectal liver metastasis to chemotherapy.

Conclusions: The non-mono-exponential diffusion models may be able to predict early response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastasis.

Citing Articles

Predictive value of gemstone spectral imaging for chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer liver metastases: A retrospective study.

Ning H, Qin Y, Yue K, Wang S, Shao W, Wang G J Res Med Sci. 2025; 29:76.

PMID: 39871875 PMC: 11771818. DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_630_23.


Application of advanced diffusion models from diffusion weighted imaging in a large cohort study of breast lesions.

Ji Y, Xu J, Wang Z, Guo X, Kong D, Wang H BMC Med Imaging. 2023; 23(1):52.

PMID: 37041466 PMC: 10091641. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01005-6.


Role of advanced imaging techniques in the evaluation of oncological therapies in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Caruso M, Stanzione A, Prinster A, Pizzuti L, Brunetti A, Maurea S World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(3):521-535.

PMID: 36688023 PMC: 9850941. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i3.521.


2450-MHz microwave ablation of liver metastases under 3.0 T wide-bore magnetic resonance guidance: a pilot study.

Xu K, Li Z, Liu Y, Liu Z, Wang C, Jiao D Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):12640.

PMID: 35879411 PMC: 9314346. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16989-4.


Quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.

Hernando D, Zhang Y, Pirasteh A Med Phys. 2021; 49(4):2774-2793.

PMID: 34554579 PMC: 8940741. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15246.


References
1.
Adam R . Chemotherapy and surgery: new perspectives on the treatment of unresectable liver metastases. Ann Oncol. 2003; 14 Suppl 2:ii13-6. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg731. View

2.
Yablonskiy D, Bretthorst G, Ackerman J . Statistical model for diffusion attenuated MR signal. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 50(4):664-9. PMC: 2140254. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10578. View

3.
Bennett K, Schmainda K, Bennett R, Rowe D, Lu H, Hyde J . Characterization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched-exponential model. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 50(4):727-34. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10581. View

4.
Jensen J, Helpern J, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K . Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005; 53(6):1432-40. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20508. View

5.
Koh D, Scurr E, Collins D, Kanber B, Norman A, Leach M . Predicting response of colorectal hepatic metastasis: value of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(4):1001-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0601. View