» Articles » PMID: 31215625

Occlusion Rate and Visual Complications With Flow-Diverter Stent Placed Across the Ophthalmic Artery's Origin for Carotid-Ophthalmic Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Neurosurgery
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2019 Jun 20
PMID 31215625
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Flow-diverter stents (FDSs) have recently gained acceptance for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, especially for carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms (COAs). However, complications have been reported after coverage of side branches, especially the ophthalmic artery (OA).

Objective: To evaluate, through a meta-analysis, the occlusion rate, and the ophthalmic complications after treatment of COA by FDS.

Methods: We reviewed on MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Cochrane central database via CENTRAL. We included all case series with at least 15 patients and clinical trials about flow diversion of aneurysms close to the OA's origin. Among these studies, we only included articles with aneurysm occlusion rate and rate of new ophthalmic symptoms.

Results: We included 16 studies with 913 COA treated by FDSs and covering the OA with a mean follow-up of 16.4 mo. The random-effect modeling analysis concerning the overall rate of new ophthalmic complications, after FDS deployment covering the OA, was 3.0% (CI95% 1.0-6.0). There was medium-high heterogeneity in the study reports P < .01, I2 = 70.2% [50.4%; 82.1%]. We were not able to statistically explain this heterogeneity with the performed analysis, which could be related to the design of the included studies. We found an overall aneurysm occlusion rate of 85.0% (95% CI 80.0-89.0).

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis found a high aneurysm occlusion rate (85%) and low rate of iatrogenic visual complications, with only 3.0% of new visual symptoms, after treatment of COA by FDS.

Citing Articles

How Flow Diverter Selection Can Affect the Flow Changes within a Jailed Ophthalmic Artery: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.

Unsal C, Guclu G, Olcay A, Hassankhani A, Bilgin C, Hakyemez B Asian J Neurosurg. 2024; 19(3):426-434.

PMID: 39205892 PMC: 11349421. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787868.


The aneurysm occlusion and recurrence of posterior communicating artery aneurysms following the treatment with the pipeline embolization device.

Xue X, Liang X, Miao Y, Sun M, Liu H, Tong X Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):330.

PMID: 39007950 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02580-0.


Internal Carotid Artery Pseudoaneurysm After Transsphenoidal Pituitary Tumor Resection: A Case Report.

Montagne W, Lloyd N, Sagalow E, Cox E, Hardman J, Kim J Cureus. 2023; 15(3):e36539.

PMID: 37090349 PMC: 10121229. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36539.


Endovascular treatment of aneurysms of the paraophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery: Current status.

Wang Y, Yu J Front Neurol. 2022; 13:913704.

PMID: 36188411 PMC: 9523143. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.913704.


Incomplete occlusion and visual symptoms of peri-ophthalmic aneurysm after treatment with a pipeline embolization device: a multi-center cohort study.

Xu C, Wu P, Sun B, Xu S, Luo B, Yang X Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022; 164(8):2191-2202.

PMID: 35554695 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05239-1.