» Articles » PMID: 31212852

Dynamic Measurements Using FDM 3D-Printed Embedded Strain Sensors

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2019 Jun 20
PMID 31212852
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

3D-printing technology is opening up new possibilities for the co-printing of sensory elements. While quasi-static research has shown promise, the dynamic performance has yet to be researched. This study researched smart 3D structures with embedded and printed sensory elements. The embedded strain sensor was based on the conductive PLA (Polylactic Acid) material. The research was focused on dynamic measurements of the strain and considered the theoretical background of the piezoresistivity of conductive PLA materials, the temperature effects, the nonlinearities, the dynamic range, the electromagnetic sensitivity and the frequency range. A quasi-static calibration used in the dynamic measurements was proposed. It was shown that the temperature effects were negligible, the sensory element was linear as long as the structure had a linear response, the dynamic range started at ∼ 30 μ ϵ and broadband performance was in the range of few kHz (depending on the size of the printed sensor). The promising results support future applications of smart 3D-printed systems with embedded sensory elements being used for dynamic measurements in areas where currently piezo-crystal-based sensors are used.

Citing Articles

Smart Spare Parts (SSP) in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Systematic Review.

Morales Pavez G, Duran O Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(16).

PMID: 39205130 PMC: 11359701. DOI: 10.3390/s24165437.


Surface Modification of Copper-Based Flakes for Conductive Polymer Composites.

Mihelcic M, Oseli A, Rojac T, Slemenik Perse L Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 38931970 PMC: 11207403. DOI: 10.3390/polym16121620.


Carbon-Based Piezoresistive Polymer Nanocomposites by Extrusion Additive Manufacturing: Process, Material Design, and Current Progress.

Banks J, Emami A 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2024; 11(2):e548-e571.

PMID: 38689914 PMC: 11057547. DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2022.0153.


3D Printed Lattice Template by Material Extrusion Technique for Fabrication of Pixelated Photodetector.

Bisht B, Toutam V, Dhakate S 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023; 10(6):1394-1404.

PMID: 38116210 PMC: 10726183. DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2022.0386.


Closed-Loop Filament Feed Control in Fused Filament Fabrication.

Moretti M, Rossi A 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023; 10(3):500-513.

PMID: 37346190 PMC: 10280219. DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0236.


References
1.
Yin F, Ye D, Zhu C, Qiu L, Huang Y . Stretchable, Highly Durable Ternary Nanocomposite Strain Sensor for Structural Health Monitoring of Flexible Aircraft. Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(11). PMC: 5713651. DOI: 10.3390/s17112677. View

2.
Xu Y, Wu X, Guo X, Kong B, Zhang M, Qian X . The Boom in 3D-Printed Sensor Technology. Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(5). PMC: 5470911. DOI: 10.3390/s17051166. View

3.
Agarwala S, Goh G, Le T, An J, Peh Z, Yeong W . Wearable Bandage-Based Strain Sensor for Home Healthcare: Combining 3D Aerosol Jet Printing and Laser Sintering. ACS Sens. 2018; 4(1):218-226. DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.8b01293. View

4.
Muth J, Vogt D, Truby R, Menguc Y, Kolesky D, Wood R . Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors within highly stretchable elastomers. Adv Mater. 2014; 26(36):6307-12. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201400334. View

5.
Leigh S, Bradley R, Purssell C, Billson D, Hutchins D . A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49365. PMC: 3504018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049365. View