» Articles » PMID: 31210998

Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2019 Jun 19
PMID 31210998
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Older patients with hip fracture have a 20% to 30% mortality rate in the year after surgery. Nonoperative care has higher 1-year mortality rates and is generally only pursued in those with an extraordinarily high surgical risk. As the population ages, more patients with hip fracture may fall into this category. The orthopedic surgeon is typically the main consultant responsible for deciding between surgery and conservative management, and the reasoning behind one decision over the other is often poorly understood. We undertook a review to determine decision-making tools for surgery in high-risk patients with hip fracture.

Materials And Methods: A review was conducted using PubMed to determine articles published using the terms palliative care, conservative care, nonoperative, hip fracture, orthopedic procedures, fracture fixation, and surgery. Our search resulted in 13 articles to review. These were further screened to determine tools for use in surgical decision-making.

Results: Several potential decision-making tools were found in our search. The potential tools to identify patients who would benefit from nonoperative treatment included the Palliative Performance Scale for severe dementia, the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Katz Activities of Daily Living scales for prefracture immobility, a combination of clinical signs and laboratory tests to determine risk of imminent death, and the Charlson Comorbidity Score for additional serious comorbidities. No tools have been prospectively tested in a clinical setting.

Discussion: Evaluation of each patient using a variety of decision making tools should help the orthopedic surgeon determine which patients would be better suited to non-operative management. After determining the benefit of non-operative care, they must effectively allow the fracture to heal while ameliorating pain. Palliative care physicians can fulfill this role by providing support and symptom relief.

Conclusions: Surgical decision-making for hip fracture repair in the elderly patients is not straight forward. Several tools may be helpful to the surgeon in determining who may be better suited for nonoperative care or a palliative care referral. Prospective data do not exist in these decision-making tools.

Citing Articles

SPING Block Analgesia in Non-Operative Management of Proximal Femur Fractures in Older Adults Living with Frailty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

van der Velden M, Kroes T, Visschers N, de Loos F, Janssens P, Spaetgens B Geriatrics (Basel). 2025; 10(1.

PMID: 39846580 PMC: 11755650. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics10010010.


Palliative care is a viable option for frail elderly patients with neurocognitive disorders admitted for hip fractures.

Boulet J, Belzile E, Dion N, Morency C, Berube M, Tremblay A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):635.

PMID: 39127682 PMC: 11316310. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07739-w.


Strategies to improve end-of-life decision-making and palliative care following hip fracture in frail older adults: a scoping review.

Tremblay A, Pelet S, Belzile E, Boulet J, Morency C, Dion N Age Ageing. 2024; 53(7).

PMID: 38970548 PMC: 11227115. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae134.


Patient and proxy perspectives in decision-making for geriatric hip fracture management in the Netherlands: a qualitative study.

Laane D, Kroes T, van den Berg A, de Jongh M, The R, van der Velde D BMJ Open. 2024; 14(6):e082093.

PMID: 38858152 PMC: 11168140. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082093.


Palliative Non-Operative Management in Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: When Would Surgeons Abstain from Surgery?.

Bui M, Groothuis-Oudshoorn C, Witteveen A, Hegeman J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541820 PMC: 10971027. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061594.


References
1.
Morrison R, Siu A . Survival in end-stage dementia following acute illness. JAMA. 2000; 284(1):47-52. DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.1.47. View

2.
Heikkinen T, Parker M, Jalovaara P . Hip fractures in Finland and Great Britain--a comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes. Int Orthop. 2002; 25(6):349-54. PMC: 3620780. DOI: 10.1007/s002640100272. View

3.
Jain R, Basinski A, Kreder H . Nonoperative treatment of hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2003; 27(1):11-7. PMC: 3673693. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-002-0404-y. View

4.
Menec V . The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: a 6-year longitudinal study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003; 58(2):S74-82. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/58.2.s74. View

5.
Kagansky N, Rimon E, Naor S, Dvornikov E, Cojocaru L, Levy S . Low incidence of delirium in very old patients after surgery for hip fractures. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004; 12(3):306-14. View