» Articles » PMID: 31210073

Registry Study on Failure Incidence in 1,127 Revised Hip Implants with Stem Trunnion Re-use After 10 Years of Follow-up: Limited Influence of an Adapter Sleeve

Overview
Journal Acta Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Jun 19
PMID 31210073
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background and purpose - Little is known about the role of retained trunnions in revision hip arthroplasties, i.e., when only the femoral head is substituted. Wear (fretting corrosion) and ceramic head fractures are 2 poorly understood concerns related to use, and the role of adapter sleeves has not been defined. In this registry study we assessed the influence of sleeve interposition on re-revision rates in revision hip arthroplasties with retained stems. Confounding factors (demographics, implant-related features) and failures were also analyzed. Patients and methods - We conducted a registry study on 1,127 revised implants (retained trunnion and head exchange). In 26% of implants an adapter sleeve was interposed; in 74% no adapter sleeve was implanted. Demographic and implant-related features were investigated including a descriptive analysis of failures. Results - The mean follow-up of revised implants with and without the use of an adapter sleeve was 3.3 and 5.1 years, respectively. The implant survival without an adapter sleeve was significantly higher, 98.4% (95% CI 96.9-99.8) vs. 95.2% (CI 93.2-96.6) with an adapter sleeve at 5 years. No re-revisions due to adverse local tissue reactions or ceramic head fractures were reported. In order to overcome the different distribution of head materials and head sizes in the two cohorts, only Delta balls were investigated. Interpretation - Adapter sleeve interposition had a minor influence on the revision rates. No adverse local tissue reactions or head fractures occurred.

Citing Articles

The impact of retaining the femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Poursalehian M, Zafarmandi S, Razzaghof M, Mortazavi S Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 144(2):947-966.

PMID: 37831198 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05087-3.


Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.

Zgouridou A, Kenanidis E, Potoupnis M, Tsiridis E Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 34(2):1219-1251.

PMID: 37768398 PMC: 10858160. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03691-y.


Survival rates and reasons for revision of different stem designs in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia: a regional registry study.

Di Martino A, Castagnini F, Stefanini N, Bordini B, Geraci G, Pilla F J Orthop Traumatol. 2021; 22(1):29.

PMID: 34275012 PMC: 8286209. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-021-00590-y.

References
1.
Hannouche D, Delambre J, Zadegan F, Sedel L, Nizard R . Is there a risk in placing a ceramic head on a previously implanted trunion?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(12):3322-7. PMC: 2974880. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1505-3. View

2.
Koch C, Figgie Jr M, Figgie M, Elpers M, Wright T, Padgett D . Ceramic Bearings with Titanium Adapter Sleeves Implanted During Revision Hip Arthroplasty Show Minimal Fretting or Corrosion: a Retrieval Analysis. HSS J. 2017; 13(3):241-247. PMC: 5617823. DOI: 10.1007/s11420-017-9566-4. View

3.
Berstock J, Whitehouse M, Duncan C . Trunnion corrosion: what surgeons need to know in 2018. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(1 Supple A):44-49. PMC: 6424439. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0569.R1. View

4.
Osman K, Panagiotidou A, Khan M, Blunn G, Haddad F . Corrosion at the head-neck interface of current designs of modular femoral components: essential questions and answers relating to corrosion in modular head-neck junctions. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(5):579-84. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B5.35592. View

5.
Guhrs J, Krull A, Witt F, Morlock M . The influence of stem taper re-use upon the failure load of ceramic heads. Med Eng Phys. 2015; 37(6):545-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.03.010. View