» Articles » PMID: 31209714

Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA with a Single-Molecule Sequencing Analysis Validated for Targeted and Immunotherapy Selection

Overview
Journal Mol Diagn Ther
Date 2019 Jun 19
PMID 31209714
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Comprehensive genetic cancer profiling using circulating tumor DNA has enabled the detection of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-recommended somatic alterations from a single, non-invasive blood draw. However, reliably detecting somatic variants at low variant allele fractions (VAFs) remains a challenge for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based tests. We have developed the single-molecule sequencing (SMSEQ) platform to address these challenges.

Methods: The OncoLBx assay utilizes the SMSEQ platform to optimize cell-free DNA extraction and library preparation with variant type-specific calling algorithms to improve sensitivity and specificity. OncoLBx is a pan-cancer panel for solid tumors targeting 75 genes and five microsatellite sites analyzing five classes of NCCN-recommended somatic variants: single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions (indels), copy number variants (CNVs), fusions and microsatellite instability (MSI). Circulating DNA was extracted from plasma, followed by library preparation using SMSEQ. Analytical validation was performed according to recently published American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines and established the limit of detection (LOD), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and reproducibility using 126 gold-standard reference samples, healthy donor samples verified by whole-exome sequencing by an external College of American Pathologists (CAP) reference lab and cell lines with known variants. Results were analyzed using a locus-specific modeling algorithm.

Results: We have demonstrated that OncoLBx detects VAFs of ≥ 0.1% for SNVs and indels, ≥ 0.5% for fusions, ≥ 4.5 copies for CNVs and ≥ 2% for MSI, with all variant types having specificity ≥ 99.999%. Diagnostic performance of paired samples displays 80% sensitivity and > 99.999% clinical specificity. Clinical utility and performance were assessed in 416 solid tumor samples. Variants were detected in 79% of samples, for which 87.34% of positive samples had available targeted therapy.

Citing Articles

Development and Clinical Validation of a Blood Test for Early Detection of Colorectal Adenomas and Cancer for Screening and Postpolypectomy Surveillance.

Friedland S, Watson D, Pan J, Chen Y, Nimgaonkar A, Gulzar Z Gastro Hep Adv. 2024; 1(2):223-230.

PMID: 39131126 PMC: 11308738. DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2021.11.004.


Microsatellite instability assessment is instrumental for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine: status quo and outlook.

Styk J, Pos Z, Pos O, Radvanszky J, Hrckova Turnova E, Buglyo G EPMA J. 2023; 14(1):143-165.

PMID: 36866160 PMC: 9971410. DOI: 10.1007/s13167-023-00312-w.


Sensitive detection of microsatellite instability in tissues and liquid biopsies: Recent developments and updates.

Yu F, Makrigiorgos A, Leong K, Makrigiorgos G Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021; 19:4931-4940.

PMID: 34527197 PMC: 8433064. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.037.


Detection of Microsatellite Instability: State of the Art and Future Applications in Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA).

Gilson P, Merlin J, Harle A Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(7).

PMID: 33804907 PMC: 8037825. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071491.


Ultra-Deep Massive Parallel Sequencing of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Enables Large-Scale Profiling of Driver Mutations in Vietnamese Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Tran L, Nguyen Q, Nguyen C, Tran V, Nguyen T, Le H Front Oncol. 2020; 10:1351.

PMID: 32850431 PMC: 7418519. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01351.

References
1.
Peng M, Chen C, Hulbert A, Brock M, Yu F . Non-blood circulating tumor DNA detection in cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(40):69162-69173. PMC: 5620327. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19942. View

2.
Lanman R, Mortimer S, Zill O, Sebisanovic D, Lopez R, Blau S . Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Digital Sequencing Panel for Quantitative, Highly Accurate Evaluation of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA. PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0140712. PMC: 4608804. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140712. View

3.
Barlesi F, Mazieres J, Merlio J, Debieuvre D, Mosser J, Lena H . Routine molecular profiling of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a 1-year nationwide programme of the French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT). Lancet. 2016; 387(10026):1415-1426. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00004-0. View

4.
Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, Doherty J, Politi K, Sarkaria I . EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(36):13306-11. PMC: 516528. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0405220101. View

5.
Hong M, Macintyre G, Wedge D, Van Loo P, Patel K, Lunke S . Tracking the origins and drivers of subclonal metastatic expansion in prostate cancer. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:6605. PMC: 4396364. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7605. View