» Articles » PMID: 31209198

Targeting the Cell Cycle in Head and Neck Cancer by Chk1 Inhibition: a Novel Concept of Bimodal Cell Death

Overview
Journal Oncogenesis
Date 2019 Jun 19
PMID 31209198
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) coincide with poor survival rates. The lack of driver oncogenes complicates the development of targeted treatments for HNSCC. Here, we follow-up on two previous genome-wide RNA and microRNA interference screens in HNSCC to cross-examine tumor-specific lethality by targeting ATM, ATR, CHEK1, or CHEK2. Our results uncover CHEK1 as the most promising target for HNSCC. CHEK1 expression is essential across a panel of HNSCC cell lines but redundant for growth and survival of untransformed oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts. LY2603618 (Rabusertib), which specifically targets Chk1 kinase, kills HNSCC cells effectively and specifically. Our findings show that HNSCC cells depend on Chk1-mediated signaling to progress through S-phase successfully. Chk1 inhibition coincides with stalled DNA replication, replication fork collapses, and accumulation of DNA damage. We further show that Chk1 inhibition leads to bimodal HNSCC cell killing. In the most sensitive cell lines, apoptosis is induced in S-phase, whereas more resistant cell lines manage to bypass replication-associated apoptosis, but accumulate chromosomal breaks that become lethal in subsequent mitosis. Interestingly, CDK1 expression correlates with treatment outcome. Moreover, sensitivity to Chk1 inhibition requires functional CDK1 and CDK4/6 to drive cell cycle progression, arguing against combining Chk1 inhibitors with CDK inhibitors. In contrast, Wee1 inhibitor Adavosertib progresses the cell cycle and thereby increases lethality to Chk1 inhibition in HNSCC cell lines. We conclude that Chk1 has become a key molecule in HNSCC cell cycle regulation and a very promising therapeutic target. Chk1 inhibition leads to S-phase apoptosis or death in mitosis. We provide a potential efficacy biomarker and combination therapy to follow-up in clinical setting.

Citing Articles

Comparative effects of arsenic trioxide and chemotherapy on Chk1 and CDC25 gene expression in gastric cancer cells AGS and MKN45: a potential therapeutic strategy.

Babaei S, Nikbakht M, Majd A, Mousavi S Mol Biol Rep. 2025; 52(1):198.

PMID: 39903385 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-025-10313-9.


Evaluating H2BC9 as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Wu L, Li L, Zhu M, Zhou Z, Su X, Jiang Y Eur J Med Res. 2025; 30(1):54.

PMID: 39865289 PMC: 11771076. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-02301-3.


Novel strategy for activating gene expression through triplex DNA formation targeting epigenetically suppressed genes.

Notomi R, Sasaki S, Taniguchi Y RSC Chem Biol. 2024; 5(9):884-890.

PMID: 39211471 PMC: 11353075. DOI: 10.1039/d4cb00134f.


Telomere-related DNA damage response pathways in cancer therapy: prospective targets.

Gu L, Liu M, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Wang Y, Xu Z Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1379166.

PMID: 38910895 PMC: 11190371. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1379166.


Novel Amidine Derivative K1586 Sensitizes Colorectal Cancer Cells to Ionizing Radiation by Inducing Chk1 Instability.

Kim H, Park J, Lee W, Kwon Y, Seu Y, Kim K Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(8).

PMID: 38673980 PMC: 11049894. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084396.


References
1.
Araujo A, Gelens L, Sheriff R, Santos S . Positive Feedback Keeps Duration of Mitosis Temporally Insulated from Upstream Cell-Cycle Events. Mol Cell. 2016; 64(2):362-375. PMC: 5077699. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.018. View

2.
Fava L, Bock F, Geley S, Villunger A . Caspase-2 at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2013; 125(Pt 24):5911-5. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.115105. View

3.
Leemans C, Snijders P, Brakenhoff R . The molecular landscape of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018; 18(5):269-282. DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2018.11. View

4.
Kim E, Scott L . Palbociclib: A Review in HR-Positive, HER2-Negative, Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer. Target Oncol. 2017; 12(3):373-383. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-017-0492-7. View

5.
Enomoto M, Goto H, Tomono Y, Kasahara K, Tsujimura K, Kiyono T . Novel positive feedback loop between Cdk1 and Chk1 in the nucleus during G2/M transition. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284(49):34223-30. PMC: 2797192. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.C109.051540. View