Compromising Outcomes

Overview

Journal J Am Soc Nephrol

Specialty Nephrology

Date 2019 Jun 19

PMID 31208985

Authors

Peter B Imrey

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

References

Chan A, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, Altman D . Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CMAJ. 2004; 171(7):735-40. PMC: 517858. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041086. View

Glasziou P, Altman D, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S . Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014; 383(9913):267-76. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. View

Ioannidis J, Caplan A, Dal-Re R . Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: why monitoring matters. BMJ. 2017; 356:j408. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j408. View

Roest A, de Jonge P, Williams C, de Vries Y, Schoevers R, Turner E . Reporting Bias in Clinical Trials Investigating the Efficacy of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: A Report of 2 Meta-analyses. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 72(5):500-10. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.15. View

Dwan K, Altman D, Clarke M, Gamble C, Higgins J, Sterne J . Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(6):e1001666. PMC: 4068996. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001666. View

Page M, McKenzie J, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S . Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (10):MR000035. PMC: 8191366. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2. View

Jones P, Chow J, Arango M, Fridfinnson J, Gai N, Lam K . Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals. Anesth Analg. 2017; 125(4):1292-1300. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002272. View

Hannink G, Gooszen H, Rovers M . Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions. Ann Surg. 2013; 257(5):818-23. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182864fa3. View

Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson P, Kirkham J . Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e66844. PMC: 3702538. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844. View

10.

Dmitrienko A, DAgostino Sr R . Editorial: Multiplicity issues in clinical trials. Stat Med. 2017; 36(28):4423-4426. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7506. View

11.

Fleming P, Koletsi D, Dwan K, Pandis N . Outcome discrepancies and selective reporting: impacting the leading journals?. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0127495. PMC: 4440809. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127495. View

12.

Jones C, Keil L, Holland W, Caughey M, Platts-Mills T . Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2015; 13:282. PMC: 4650202. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0520-3. View

13.

Kirkham J, Dwan K, Altman D, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R . The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010; 340:c365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c365. View

14.

Chan A, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr M, Gotzsche P, Altman D . Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004; 291(20):2457-65. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457. View

15.

Pandis N, Fleming P, Worthington H, Dwan K, Salanti G . Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0137667. PMC: 4569349. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137667. View

16.

Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman D, Ravaud P . Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2009; 302(9):977-84. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1242. View

17.

Dmitrienko A, Millen B, Lipkovich I . Multiplicity considerations in subgroup analysis. Stat Med. 2017; 36(28):4446-4454. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7416. View

18.

Hopewell S, Witt C, Linde K, Icke K, Adedire O, Kirtley S . Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials. Trials. 2018; 19(1):30. PMC: 5765661. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2395-4. View

19.

Chuang-Stein C, Li J . Changes are still needed on multiple co-primary endpoints. Stat Med. 2017; 36(28):4427-4436. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7383. View

20.

Snapinn S . Some remaining challenges regarding multiple endpoints in clinical trials. Stat Med. 2017; 36(28):4441-4445. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7390. View