» Articles » PMID: 31207477

A Comparative Assessment of Dilution Correction Methods for Spot Urinary Analyte Concentrations in a UK Population Exposed to Arsenic in Drinking Water

Overview
Journal Environ Int
Date 2019 Jun 18
PMID 31207477
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Spot urinary concentrations of environmental exposure biomarkers require correction for dilution. There is no consensus on the most appropriate method, with creatinine used by default despite lacking theoretical robustness. We comparatively assessed the efficacy of creatinine; specific gravity (SG); osmolality and modifications of all three for dilution correcting urinary arsenic. For 202 participants with urinary arsenic, creatinine, osmolality and SG measurements paired to drinking water As, we compared the performance corrections against two independent criteria: primarily, (A) correlations of corrected urinary As and the dilution measurements used to correct them - weak correlations indicating good performance and (B) correlations of corrected urinary As and drinking water As - strong correlations indicating good performance. More than a third of variation in spot urinary As concentrations was attributable to dilution. Conventional SG and osmolality correction removed significant dilution variation from As concentrations, whereas conventional creatinine over-corrected, and modifications of all three removed measurable dilution variation. Modified creatinine and both methods of SG and osmolality generated stronger correlations of urinary and drinking water As concentrations than conventional creatinine, which gave weaker correlations than uncorrected values. A disparity in optima between performance criteria was observed, with much smaller improvements possible for Criterion B relative to A. Conventional corrections - particularly creatinine - limit the utility spot urine samples, whereas a modified technique outlined here may allow substantial improvement and can be readily retrospectively applied to existing datasets. More studies are needed to optimize urinary dilution correction methods. Covariates of urinary dilution measurements still warrant consideration.

Citing Articles

Variable power functional dilution adjustment of spot urine.

Carmine T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3688.

PMID: 39885184 PMC: 11782553. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84442-9.


Exposure to heavy metals in utero and autism spectrum disorder at age 3: a meta-analysis of two longitudinal cohorts of siblings of children with autism.

Dou J, Schmidt R, Volk H, Nitta M, Feinberg J, Newschaffer C Environ Health. 2024; 23(1):62.

PMID: 38970053 PMC: 11225197. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-024-01101-2.


Assessing the Impact of PM-Bound Arsenic on Cardiovascular Risk among Workers in a Non-ferrous Metal Smelting Area: Insights from Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability.

Qi Z, Zhao Q, Yu Z, Yang Z, Feng J, Song P Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(19):8228-8238.

PMID: 38695658 PMC: 11097390. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c10761.


Exposure to heavy metals and autism spectrum disorder at age 3: A meta-analysis of two longitudinal cohorts of siblings of children with autism.

Dou J, Schmidt R, Volk H, Nitta M, Feinberg J, Newschaffer C medRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38045240 PMC: 10690342. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.21.23298827.


Association of Prenatal Exposure to Organophosphate, Pyrethroid, and Neonicotinoid Insecticides with Child Neurodevelopment at 2 Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Wang A, Wan Y, Mahai G, Qian X, Li Y, Xu S Environ Health Perspect. 2023; 131(10):107011.

PMID: 37856202 PMC: 10586492. DOI: 10.1289/EHP12097.


References
1.
Cornelis R, Heinzow B, Herber R, Christensen J, Poulsen O, Sabbioni E . Sample collection guidelines for trace elements in blood and urine. IUPAC Commission of Toxicology. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 1996; 10(2):103-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0946-672x(96)80018-6. View

2.
Araki S, Sata F, Murata K . Adjustment for urinary flow rate: an improved approach to biological monitoring. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1990; 62(6):471-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00379066. View

3.
Middleton D, Watts M, Beriro D, Hamilton E, Leonardi G, Fletcher T . Arsenic in residential soil and household dust in Cornwall, south west England: potential human exposure and the influence of historical mining. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2017; 19(4):517-527. DOI: 10.1039/c6em00690f. View

4.
Barrett J . Urinary biomarkers as exposure surrogates: controlling for possible bias. Environ Health Perspect. 2015; 123(4):A97. PMC: 4384196. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.123-A97. View

5.
Hays S, Aylward L, Gagne M, Nong A, Krishnan K . Biomonitoring equivalents for inorganic arsenic. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010; 58(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.002. View