» Articles » PMID: 31207338

Dissociating Refreshing and Elaboration and Their Impacts on Memory

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Jun 18
PMID 31207338
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Maintenance of information in working memory (WM) is assumed to rely on refreshing and elaboration, but clear mechanistic descriptions of these cognitive processes are lacking, and it is unclear whether they are simply two labels for the same process. This fMRI study investigated the extent to which refreshing, elaboration, and repeating of items in WM are distinct neural processes with dissociable behavioral outcomes in WM and long-term memory (LTM). Multivariate pattern analyses of fMRI data revealed differentiable neural signatures for these processes, which we also replicated in an independent sample of older adults. In some cases, the degree of neural separation within an individual predicted their memory performance. Elaboration improved LTM, but not WM, and this benefit increased as its neural signature became more distinct from repetition. Refreshing had no impact on LTM, but did improve WM, although the neural discrimination of this process was not predictive of the degree of improvement. These results demonstrate that refreshing and elaboration are separate processes that differently contribute to memory performance.

Citing Articles

A semantic strategy instruction intervention aimed at boosting young and older adults' visual working memory capacity.

Hart R, Nicholls L Mem Cognit. 2025; .

PMID: 40045034 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01676-8.


Towards theoretically understanding how long-term memory semantics can support working memory performance.

Hart R, Logie R, Nicholls L Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 78(2):370-390.

PMID: 39262091 PMC: 11783989. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241284414.


Does the extension of free time trigger spontaneous elaborative strategies in working memory?.

Leproult I, Lemaire B, Portrat S Mem Cognit. 2024; 52(8):2022-2052.

PMID: 39133437 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01615-7.


Active maintenance in working memory reinforces bindings for future retrieval from episodic long-term memory.

Loaiza V, Souza A Mem Cognit. 2024; 52(8):1999-2021.

PMID: 38969954 PMC: 11588845. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01596-7.


I remember it now, so I'll remember it later: Working memory strength guides predictions for long-term memory performance.

Krasnoff J, Souza A Mem Cognit. 2024; 52(8):1775-1797.

PMID: 38528299 PMC: 11588788. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-023-01514-3.


References
1.
Ranganath C, Cohen M, Brozinsky C . Working memory maintenance contributes to long-term memory formation: neural and behavioral evidence. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(7):994-1010. DOI: 10.1162/0898929054475118. View

2.
Johnson M, Raye C, Mitchell K, Greene E, Anderson A . FMRI evidence for an organization of prefrontal cortex by both type of process and type of information. Cereb Cortex. 2003; 13(3):265-73. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/13.3.265. View

3.
Barr D, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily H . Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2014; 68(3). PMC: 3881361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. View

4.
Rose N, LaRocque J, Riggall A, Gosseries O, Starrett M, Meyering E . Reactivation of latent working memories with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Science. 2016; 354(6316):1136-1139. PMC: 5221753. DOI: 10.1126/science.aah7011. View

5.
Loaiza V, Souza A . An age-related deficit in preserving the benefits of attention in working memory. Psychol Aging. 2019; 34(2):282-293. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000326. View