» Articles » PMID: 31205526

Prognostic Value of MTV, SUVmax and the T/N Ratio of PET/CT in Patients with Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Jun 18
PMID 31205526
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the past decade, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become an important imaging tool for clinical assessment of tumor patients. Our meta-analysis aimed to compare the predictive value of PET/CT parameters regard to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes in glioma. Relevant articles were systematically searched in PMC, PubMed, EMBASE and WEB of science. Studies involving the prognostic roles of PET/CT parameters with OS and PFS in glioma patients were evaluated. The impact of metabolic tumor volume (MTV), maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), and the ratio of uptake in tumor to normal (T/N ratio) on survival was measured by calculating combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 32 articles with 1715 patients were included. The combined HRs of higher MTV, higher SUVmax and higher T/N ratio for OS were 1.14 (95% CI: 0.98-1.32, P heterogeneity<0.001), 1.69 (95% CI: 1.18-2.41, P heterogeneity<0.001) and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.40-2.01, P heterogeneity< 0.001), respectively. Regarding PFS, the combined HRs were 1.04 (95% CI: 0.97-1.11, P heterogeneity=0.002) with higher MTV, 1.45 (95% CI: 1.11-1.90, P heterogeneity<0.001) with higher SUVmax and 2.07 (95% CI: 1.45-2.95, P heterogeneity<0.001) with higher T/N ratio. Results remained similar in the sub-group analyses. PET/CT parameters T/N ratio may be a significant prognostic factor in patients with glioma. Evidence of SUVmax and MTV needed more large-scale studies performed to validate. PET/CT scan could be a promising technique to provide prognostic information for these patients.

Citing Articles

Quantitative PSMA-PET parameters in localized prostate cancer: prognostic and potential predictive value.

Bela Andela S, Amthauer H, Furth C, Rogasch J, Beck M, Mehrhof F Radiat Oncol. 2024; 19(1):97.

PMID: 39080696 PMC: 11288109. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02483-w.


Correlation of Transcriptomics and FDG-PET SUVmax Indicates Reciprocal Expression of Stemness-Related Transcription Factor and Neuropeptide Signaling Pathways in Glucose Metabolism of Ewing Sarcoma.

Prexler C, Knape M, Erlewein-Schweizer J, Roll W, Specht K, Woertler K Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(23).

PMID: 36497479 PMC: 9735504. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235999.


Clinical Perspectives for F-FDG PET Imaging in Pediatric Oncology: Μetabolic Tumor Volume and Radiomics.

Lyra V, Chatziioannou S, Kallergi M Metabolites. 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35323660 PMC: 8956064. DOI: 10.3390/metabo12030217.


A Retrospective Analysis of the Correlation between Functional Imaging and Clinical Outcomes in Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs G3).

Laffi A, Colandrea M, Buonsanti G, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Spada F Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(12).

PMID: 34943637 PMC: 8700454. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122401.


Dynamic C-Methionine PET-CT: Prognostic Factors for Disease Progression and Survival in Patients with Suspected Glioma Recurrence.

Mattoli M, Trevisi G, Scolozzi V, Capotosti A, Cocciolillo F, Marini I Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(19).

PMID: 34638262 PMC: 8508090. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194777.


References
1.
Stroup D, Berlin J, Morton S, Olkin I, Williamson G, Rennie D . Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283(15):2008-12. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008. View

2.
Stupp R, Dietrich P, Ostermann Kraljevic S, Pica A, Maillard I, Maeder P . Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(5):1375-82. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1375. View

3.
Mantel N, Haenszel W . Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959; 22(4):719-48. View

4.
Chen W, Silverman D, Delaloye S, Czernin J, Kamdar N, Pope W . 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. J Nucl Med. 2006; 47(6):904-11. View

5.
Louis D, Ohgaki H, Wiestler O, Cavenee W, Burger P, Jouvet A . The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007; 114(2):97-109. PMC: 1929165. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. View