» Articles » PMID: 31200546

Proprietary Algorithms for Polygenic Risk: Protecting Scientific Innovation or Hiding the Lack of It?

Overview
Journal Genes (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Jun 16
PMID 31200546
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies aim to predict the risks of complex diseases using proprietary algorithms. Companies keep algorithms as trade secrets for competitive advantage, but a market that thrives on the premise that customers can make their own decisions about genetic testing should respect customer autonomy and informed decision making and maximize opportunities for transparency. The algorithm itself is only one piece of the information that is deemed essential for understanding how prediction algorithms are developed and evaluated. Companies should be encouraged to disclose everything else, including the expected risk distribution of the algorithm when applied in the population, using a benchmark DNA dataset. A standardized presentation of information and risk distributions allows customers to compare test offers and scientists to verify whether the undisclosed algorithms could be valid. A new model of oversight in which stakeholders collaboratively keep a check on the commercial market is needed.

Citing Articles

The Emotional Dimension of Value: A Proposal for Its Quantitative Measurement.

Ruiz-Roqueni M Front Psychol. 2022; 12:807412.

PMID: 35185704 PMC: 8850975. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807412.


Genetically influenced externalizing and internalizing risk pathways as novel prevention targets.

Dick D, Saunders T, Balcke E, Driver M, Neale Z, Vassileva J Psychol Addict Behav. 2021; 36(6):595-606.

PMID: 34110842 PMC: 8660940. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000759.


Impute.me: An Open-Source, Non-profit Tool for Using Data From Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing to Calculate and Interpret Polygenic Risk Scores.

Folkersen L, Pain O, Ingason A, Werge T, Lewis C, Austin J Front Genet. 2020; 11:578.

PMID: 32714365 PMC: 7340159. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00578.


SEPSIS. Educational and Best Practice Frontiers. Beyond the Boundaries of Fatality, Enhancing Clinical Skills and Precision Medicine.

Trovato G Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020; 16:87-93.

PMID: 32103969 PMC: 7024868. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S232530.

References
1.
Rudin C . Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead. Nat Mach Intell. 2022; 1(5):206-215. PMC: 9122117. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. View

2.
Bijlsma M, Rendering A, Chin-On N, Debska A, von Karsa L, Knopnadel J . Quality criteria for health checks: development of a European consensus agreement. Prev Med. 2014; 67:238-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.005. View

3.
Janssens A, Ioannidis J, Van Duijn C, Little J, Khoury M . Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011; 19(8):833-6. PMC: 3172920. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.25. View

4.
Imai K, Kricka L, Fortina P . Concordance study of 3 direct-to-consumer genetic-testing services. Clin Chem. 2010; 57(3):518-21. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.158220. View

5.
Kaye J . The regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Hum Mol Genet. 2008; 17(R2):R180-3. PMC: 2672785. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddn253. View