» Articles » PMID: 31198384

A Comparative Evaluation of Intracanal Calcium Hydroxide Removal with Hand File, Rotary File, and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation: An Study

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2019 Jun 15
PMID 31198384
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of hand file (K-file), rotary file (HERO shaper), and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI; U-file) in removing Ca(OH) from the root canal.

Materials And Methods: Thirty single-rooted teeth were collected and decoronated to standardize the length to 14 mm. Cleaning and shaping were conducted using HERO shaper rotary files (up to no. 25, 4% taper). Ca(OH) powder was mixed with normal saline and filled into the canals using lentulo spiral and the orifice was sealed with zinc oxide eugenol. After 7 days of incubation, samples were divided into three groups of 10 samples each: Group I (hand files)-no. 20 K-file; Group II (rotary files)-no. 25, 4% HERO shaper; Group III (PUI)-no. 20 U-file. Ca(OH) paste was removed using 2 mL of 3% sodium hypochlorite solution followed by 1-minute activation of the respective file system. All the samples were finally irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and flushed with distilled water.

Results: Ultrasonic group was more effective in removing Ca(OH) followed by HERO shaper and hand file.

Conclusion: It was concluded that PUI had the highest ability to remove Ca(OH) from the root canal walls.

Citing Articles

Effect of Finisher Gentlefile brush, XP-endo Finisher and ultrasonic irrigation for the removal of calcium hydroxide paste from root canal.

Pawar O, Nayak G, Pradeep P, A R V, Nambiar D, Ravi R Bioinformation. 2025; 20(9):1052-1058.

PMID: 39917224 PMC: 11795459. DOI: 10.6026/9732063002001052.


The efficacy of EndoActivator, passive ultrasonic irrigation, and Ultra X in removing calcium hydroxide from root canals: an in-vitro study.

Adl A, Razavian A, Eskandari F BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):564.

PMID: 36463133 PMC: 9719616. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02626-z.


Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation on intracanal medicament removal from root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhou J, Liu T, Guo L BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):294.

PMID: 34107959 PMC: 8191128. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01644-7.


Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial.

Motiwala M, Badar S, Ghafoor R Eur Endod J. 2021; 6(1):38-43.

PMID: 33907070 PMC: 8056807. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2020.78941.


Efficacy of the Rotary Instrument XP-Endo Finisher in the Removal of Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal Medicament in Combination with Different Irrigation Techniques: A Microtomographic Study.

Denna J, Shafie L, Alsofi L, Al-Habib M, AlShwaimi E Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(10).

PMID: 32408644 PMC: 7288082. DOI: 10.3390/ma13102222.

References
1.
Calt S, Serper A . Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod. 1999; 25(6):431-3. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80273-8. View

2.
Siqueira Jr J, Lopes H . Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. Int Endod J. 1999; 32(5):361-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00275.x. View

3.
Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M . In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2005; 31(3):166-70. DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000137651.01496.48. View

4.
van der Sluis L, Wu M, Wesselink P . A comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in removing artificially placed dentine debris from root canals in resin blocks during ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J. 2005; 38(9):593-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00921.x. View

5.
Schafer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T . Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2006; 39(3):196-202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x. View