A Comparative Evaluation of Intracanal Calcium Hydroxide Removal with Hand File, Rotary File, and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation: An Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of hand file (K-file), rotary file (HERO shaper), and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI; U-file) in removing Ca(OH) from the root canal.
Materials And Methods: Thirty single-rooted teeth were collected and decoronated to standardize the length to 14 mm. Cleaning and shaping were conducted using HERO shaper rotary files (up to no. 25, 4% taper). Ca(OH) powder was mixed with normal saline and filled into the canals using lentulo spiral and the orifice was sealed with zinc oxide eugenol. After 7 days of incubation, samples were divided into three groups of 10 samples each: Group I (hand files)-no. 20 K-file; Group II (rotary files)-no. 25, 4% HERO shaper; Group III (PUI)-no. 20 U-file. Ca(OH) paste was removed using 2 mL of 3% sodium hypochlorite solution followed by 1-minute activation of the respective file system. All the samples were finally irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and flushed with distilled water.
Results: Ultrasonic group was more effective in removing Ca(OH) followed by HERO shaper and hand file.
Conclusion: It was concluded that PUI had the highest ability to remove Ca(OH) from the root canal walls.
Pawar O, Nayak G, Pradeep P, A R V, Nambiar D, Ravi R Bioinformation. 2025; 20(9):1052-1058.
PMID: 39917224 PMC: 11795459. DOI: 10.6026/9732063002001052.
Adl A, Razavian A, Eskandari F BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):564.
PMID: 36463133 PMC: 9719616. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02626-z.
Zhou J, Liu T, Guo L BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):294.
PMID: 34107959 PMC: 8191128. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01644-7.
Motiwala M, Badar S, Ghafoor R Eur Endod J. 2021; 6(1):38-43.
PMID: 33907070 PMC: 8056807. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2020.78941.
Denna J, Shafie L, Alsofi L, Al-Habib M, AlShwaimi E Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(10).
PMID: 32408644 PMC: 7288082. DOI: 10.3390/ma13102222.