Automatic and Controlled Attentional Capture by Threatening Stimuli

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2019 Jun 14

PMID 31193478

Citations 8

Authors

R A Fabio

T Capri

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The rapid orienting of attention to potential threats would seem to proceed outside of top-down control. However, there is no convincing empirical finding that threatening stimuli only capture attention in a bottom-up way. The present study was designed to investigate the role of top-down and bottom-up processes in attentional bias to threats. We report a dot-probe experiment examining spatial cuing (valid and invalid) using threatening (spiders or snakes) or neutral (clownfish) stimuli in two conditions (predictable and unpredictable task). Forty-two students between the ages of 20 and 35 years participated in the study. They performed the probe detection task. Results suggested that threatening stimuli can capture attention, but this attentional effect cannot be regarded as totally bottom-up or automatic. We argue that attentional capture by threatening stimuli could be the result of a mechanism of attention shifting between bottom-up and top-down systems.

Citing Articles

Highly dangerous road hazards are not immune from the low prevalence effect.

Song J, Wolfe B Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):6.

PMID: 38302804 PMC: 10834906. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00531-3.

Cognitive Performances: The Role of Digit Ratio (D2:D4) With a Protective Factor for Anxiety.

Rinella S, Massimino S, Sorbello A, Perciavalle V, Coco M Front Neuroergon. 2024; 3:870362.

PMID: 38235465 PMC: 10790902. DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2022.870362.

Santacroce L, Tamber-Rosenau B Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):3.

PMID: 38191858 PMC: 10774501. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-023-00525-7.

Animals evoking fear in the Cradle of Humankind: snakes, scorpions, and large carnivores.

Frynta D, Elmi H, Rexova K, Janovcova M, Rudolfova V, Stolhoferova I Naturwissenschaften. 2023; 110(4):33.

PMID: 37405495 PMC: 10322782. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-023-01859-4.

Transient and Long-Term Improvements in Cognitive Processes following Video Games: An Italian Cross-Sectional Study.

Fabio R, Ingrassia M, Massa M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(1).

PMID: 35010337 PMC: 8751166. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010078.

References

Mineka S, Ohman A . Phobias and preparedness: the selective, automatic, and encapsulated nature of fear. Biol Psychiatry. 2002; 52(10):927-37. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01669-4. View

Fabio R, Antonietti A . Effects of hypermedia instruction on declarative, conditional and procedural knowledge in ADHD students. Res Dev Disabil. 2012; 33(6):2028-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.04.018. View

Frischen A, Eastwood J, Smilek D . Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychol Bull. 2008; 134(5):662-676. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.662. View

Itti L, Koch C . Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(3):194-203. DOI: 10.1038/35058500. View

Notebaert L, Crombez G, Van Damme S, De Houwer J, Theeuwes J . Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize, attention: a conditioning approach. Emotion. 2011; 11(1):81-9. DOI: 10.1037/a0021286. View

Fox E, Russo R, Dutton K . Attentional Bias for Threat: Evidence for Delayed Disengagement from Emotional Faces. Cogn Emot. 2008; 16(3):355-379. PMC: 2241753. DOI: 10.1080/02699930143000527. View

Corbetta M, Shulman G . Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(3):201-15. DOI: 10.1038/nrn755. View

Burnham B, Neely J . Involuntary capture of visual-spatial attention occurs for intersections, both real and "imagined". Psychon Bull Rev. 2007; 14(4):735-41. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196830. View

MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P . Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986; 95(1):15-20. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.95.1.15. View

10.

Hickey C, McDonald J, Theeuwes J . Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18(4):604-13. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.4.604. View

11.

Theeuwes J . Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004; 11(1):65-70. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206462. View

12.

Ohman A . Has evolution primed humans to "beware the beast"?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(42):16396-7. PMC: 2034250. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707885104. View

13.

Folk C, Remington R, Johnston J . Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992; 18(4):1030-44. View

14.

Lipp O, Derakshan N . Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion. 2005; 5(3):365-9. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.365. View

15.

Fabio R, Castriciano C, Rondanini A . ADHD: Auditory and Visual Stimuli in Automatic and Controlled Processes. J Atten Disord. 2012; 19(9):771-8. DOI: 10.1177/1087054712459562. View

16.

Kappenman E, Farrens J, Luck S, Proudfit G . Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:1368. PMC: 4255626. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01368. View

17.

Theeuwes J, Vries G, Godijn R . Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons. Percept Psychophys. 2003; 65(5):735-46. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194810. View

18.

Theeuwes J, Chen C . Attentional capture and inhibition (of return): the effect on perceptual sensitivity. Percept Psychophys. 2006; 67(8):1305-12. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193636. View

19.

Gaspelin N, Leonard C, Luck S . Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016; 79(1):45-62. PMC: 5182083. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1209-1. View

20.

Theeuwes J . Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994; 20(4):799-806. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.4.799. View