» Articles » PMID: 31192673

State Mental Health Agency Officials' Preferences for and Sources of Behavioral Health Research

Overview
Journal Psychol Serv
Date 2019 Jun 14
PMID 31192673
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

State mental health agencies (SMHAs) are integral to public behavioral health service systems. As such, senior-level officials within SMHAs are important targets for advocacy and dissemination of behavioral health research findings. Evidence-informed decision making in SMHAs can potentially be enhanced by developing summaries of behavioral health research (e.g., policy briefs) that reflect SMHA officials' information preferences, but knowledge about these preferences is lacking. An exploratory study was conducted with the aims of characterizing senior-level SMHA officials' preferences for behavioral health research and describing where they turn for this research when making policy decisions. A cross-sectional, web-based survey of senior-level SMHA officials (1 per state) was conducted in March-May 2017 ( = 43, response rate = 84%). The features of behavioral health research that SMHA officials identified as "very important" most frequently were research being relevant to state residents (93.0%), providing data on cost-effectiveness (86.0%) and budget impact (81.4%), and being presented concisely (81.0%). The primary sources that SMHA officials turned to for behavioral research when making policy decisions were professional organizations (79.1%), SMHA agency staff (60.5%), and university researchers (55.8%). Compared with state legislators' responses to the same survey questions, results suggest that senior-level SMHA officials and legislators have similar preferences for behavioral health research but turn to different sources for this research. Advocates and researchers who seek to promote evidence-informed decision making in SMHAs should consider developing policy briefs that are concise, provide state-level prevalence data about behavioral conditions, and contain economic evaluation data, and they should disseminate these materials to multiple sources. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Design considerations for developing measures of policy implementation in quantitative evaluations of public health policy.

Smith N, Levy D, Falbe J, Purtle J, Chriqui J Front Health Serv. 2024; 4:1322702.

PMID: 39076770 PMC: 11285065. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1322702.


Study protocol for a multi-level cross-sectional study on the equitable reach and implementation of coordinated specialty care for early psychosis.

Oluwoye O, Lissau A, Stokes S, Selloni A, James N, Amiri S Implement Sci Commun. 2023; 4(1):90.

PMID: 37553719 PMC: 10410783. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00476-6.


A policy implementation study of earmarked taxes for mental health services: study protocol.

Purtle J, Stadnick N, Wynecoop M, Bruns E, Crane M, Aarons G Implement Sci Commun. 2023; 4(1):37.

PMID: 37004117 PMC: 10067193. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00408-4.


Tailoring dissemination strategies to increase evidence-informed policymaking for opioid use disorder treatment: study protocol.

Crable E, Grogan C, Purtle J, Roesch S, Aarons G Implement Sci Commun. 2023; 4(1):16.

PMID: 36797794 PMC: 9936679. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00396-5.


Where is "policy" in dissemination and implementation science? Recommendations to advance theories, models, and frameworks: EPIS as a case example.

Crable E, Lengnick-Hall R, Stadnick N, Moullin J, Aarons G Implement Sci. 2022; 17(1):80.

PMID: 36503520 PMC: 9742035. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01256-x.