» Articles » PMID: 31192619

Discordance in Parents' and Adolescents' Reports of Parenting: A Meta-analysis and Qualitative Review

Overview
Journal Am Psychol
Specialty Psychology
Date 2019 Jun 14
PMID 31192619
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Parents and adolescents often provide discordant reports on parenting. Prior studies are inconsistent regarding the extent, predictors, and consequences of such discordance. The current study aimed to robustly estimate the extent, potential moderators, and consequences of discordance between parent- and adolescent-reported parenting by (a) meta-analyzing a large number of studies involving both parent- and adolescent-reported parenting ( = 313) and (b) qualitatively summarizing the main methods and findings in studies examining how parent-adolescent discordance in reports of parenting relates to adolescent outcomes ( = 36). The meta-analysis demonstrated a small yet statistically significant correlation between parent- and adolescent-reported parenting ( = .276; 95% confidence interval [CI: .262, .290]); parents perceived parenting more positively than did adolescents, with a small but statistically significant mean-level difference ( = .242; 95% CI [.188, .296]). The levels of parent-adolescent discordance were higher for younger (vs. older) and male (vs. female) adolescents; for nonclinical parents (vs. parents with internalizing symptoms); in more individualistic societies such as the United States; and in ethnic minority (vs. White), low (vs. high) socioeconomic status, and nonintact (vs. intact) families among U.S. samples. The qualitative review highlighted current methodological approaches, main findings, and limitations and strengths of each approach. Together, the two components of the current study have important implications for research and clinical practice, including areas of inquiry for future studies and how researchers and clinicians should handle informant discordance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Parent-Adolescent Discrepancies in Perceiving Parental Psychological Control and Autonomy Support Predict Adolescents' Psychological Adjustment: Does Adolescent Gender Make a Difference?.

Zheng J, Chen B J Youth Adolesc. 2025; .

PMID: 39891853 DOI: 10.1007/s10964-025-02144-5.


(In)Congruences in parent-adolescent reports of physical activity parenting practices: associations with adolescent physical activity.

Chen Y, Pan S, Lin Y, Cao R, Zhang Y BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3210.

PMID: 39563309 PMC: 11575169. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20709-0.


Mother-child closeness and adolescent structural neural networks: a prospective longitudinal study of low-income families.

Hong S, Hardi F, Tillem S, Goetschius L, Brooks-Gunn J, McLoyd V Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 39512200 PMC: 11631430. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae083.


Linking Parent-Adolescent Congruence in Perceived Parental Emotional Support to Adolescent Developmental Outcomes: The More, the Better?.

Weng X, Gao M, Cao H, Han Z J Youth Adolesc. 2024; 54(3):649-664.

PMID: 39298097 DOI: 10.1007/s10964-024-02081-9.


Parent- and Adolescent-Driven Effects in Emotion-Related Communication and Longitudinal Relationships with Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents.

Hu J, Zhou T J Youth Adolesc. 2024; 54(2):310-325.

PMID: 39127816 DOI: 10.1007/s10964-024-02067-7.


References
1.
Maurizi L, Gershoff E, Aber J . Item-level discordance in parent and adolescent reports of parenting behavior and its implications for adolescents' mental health and relationships with their parents. J Youth Adolesc. 2012; 41(8):1035-52. PMC: 7988820. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-011-9741-8. View

2.
Barber B . Parental psychological control: revisiting a neglected construct. Child Dev. 1996; 67(6):3296-319. View

3.
Conger R, Donnellan M . An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006; 58:175-99. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551. View

4.
De Los Reyes A, Augenstein T, Wang M, Thomas S, Drabick D, Burgers D . The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychol Bull. 2015; 141(4):858-900. PMC: 4486608. DOI: 10.1037/a0038498. View

5.
Tanner-Smith E, Tipton E . Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and spss. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 5(1):13-30. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1091. View