» Articles » PMID: 31191090

Effects of Exercise After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Cardiac Function and Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Jun 14
PMID 31191090
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exercise program has been associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients sustaining coronary artery disease. However, little is known about the role of exercise after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Published literature was searched from Embase, PubMed, Wanfang Data, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Central Database. Exercise versus no exercise following PCI in the patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) was investigated in randomized trials. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), and angina pectoris or restenosis per randomized patients were analyzed by meta-analytic procedure to compare the curative effect of exercise program with exclusive exercise program after PCI. Ten randomized controlled trials including 1274 subjects (636 in exercise group and 638 in control group) were analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that LVEF was significantly improved in exercise group (MD = 2.82, 95% CI [1.50, 4.14], p < 0.05). In contrast, the incidence rate of cardiac death (RR = 0.24, 95% CI [007, 0.76], p = 0.02), myocardial infarction (RR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.09, 0.57], p = 0.002), coronary angioplasty (RR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.26, 0.84], p = 0.01), angina pectoris (RR = 0.39, 95% CI [0.24, 0.64], p = 0.0002) and restenosis (RR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.16, 0.83], p = 0.02) were significantly lower in exercise group. LVEDD (MD = -2.01, 95% CI [-4.72, 0.70]), 6MWD (MD = 50.85, 95% CI [-13.24, 114.94]), and CABG (RD = -0.01, 95% CI [-0.05, 0.03]) were not significantly different in the patients with or without exercise (p = 0.71). Trial sequential analysis reflected traditional meta-analysis might generate a false positive conclusion for MI and cardiac death. There was no firm evidence to support the beneficial effects of exercise after PCI for the CHD patients to improve heart function or to reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events.

Citing Articles

Identifying factors contributing to kinesiophobia in patients post-percutaneous coronary intervention.

Chen L, Li J, Ren Z, Wang L, Huang P, Jiang W BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):176.

PMID: 39953465 PMC: 11829385. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02810-w.


The Impact of Cardiac Telerehabilitation on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review Protocol.

Limonti F, Gigliotti A, Gravante F, Ramacciati N Nurs Rep. 2024; 14(4):3984-3992.

PMID: 39728652 PMC: 11676307. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14040291.


Analysis of risk factors for PCI no-reflow in coronary heart disease and construction of related prediction models.

Zhang L, Lin J, Luo L, Liu B, Zeng X Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(8):3733-3741.

PMID: 39262730 PMC: 11384415. DOI: 10.62347/ECNI6080.


Effects of different early cardiac rehabilitation exercise treatments on the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention.

Liang H, Hu X, Liao H Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024; 79:100408.

PMID: 38875753 PMC: 11226749. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100408.


Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and evidence mapping study.

Li Z, Guo K, Yang Y, Shuai Y, Fan R, Li Y Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024; 60(2):361-372.

PMID: 38345568 PMC: 11112512. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08165-0.


References
1.
Wong W, Feng J, Pwee K, Lim J . A systematic review of economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:243. PMC: 3465180. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-243. View

2.
Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson D, Zwisler A, Rees K, Martin N . Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044. View

3.
Haykowsky M, Scott J, Esch B, Schopflocher D, Myers J, Paterson I . A meta-analysis of the effects of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling following myocardial infarction: start early and go longer for greatest exercise benefits on remodeling. Trials. 2011; 12:92. PMC: 3083361. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-92. View

4.
Poortaghi S, Baghernia A, Golzari S, Safayian A, Atri S . The effect of home-based cardiac rehabilitation program on self efficacy of patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation center. BMC Res Notes. 2013; 6:287. PMC: 3733948. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-287. View

5.
Hillis L, Smith P, Bittl J, Bridges C, Byrne J, Cigarroa J . 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 143(1):4-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.015. View