» Articles » PMID: 31190131

Promoting Relational Agent for Health Behavior Change in Low and Middle - Income Countries (LMICs): Issues and Approaches

Overview
Journal J Med Syst
Date 2019 Jun 14
PMID 31190131
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of contemporary technologies in healthcare systems to improve quality of care and to promote behavioral healthcare outcomes are prevalent in high-income countries. However, low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not receiving the same advantages of technology, which may be due to inadequate technological infrastructure and financial resources, lack of interest among policy makers and healthcare service providers, lack of skills and capacity among healthcare professionals in using technology based interventions, and resistance of the public to the use of technologies for healthcare or health promotion activities. Technology-based interventions offer considerable promise to develop entirely new models of healthcare both within and outside of formal systems of care and offer the opportunity to have a large public health impact. Such technology-based interventions could be used to address targeted global health problems in LMICs, including the chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) - a growing health system burden in LMICs. Major preventable behavioral risk factors of chronic NCDs are increasing in LMICs, and innovative interventions are essential to address these risk factors. Computer-based or mobile-based virtual coaches or Relational Agents (RAs) are increasingly being explored for counseling patients to change their health behavior in high-income countries; however, the use of RAs in LMICs has not been studied. In this paper, we summarize the growing application of RA technology in behavior change interventions in high-income countries and describe the potential of its use in LMICs. Finally, we review the potential barriers and challenges in promoting RAs in LMICs.

Citing Articles

Change in sexual and reproductive health knowledge among young women using the conversational agent "Nthabi" in Lesotho: a clinical trial.

Nkabane-Nkholongo E, Mokgatle M, Bickmore T, Julce C, Thompson D, Jack B BMC Glob Public Health. 2024; 2(1):60.

PMID: 39681895 PMC: 11622940. DOI: 10.1186/s44263-024-00091-0.


Usability and Acceptability of a Conversational Agent Health Education App (Nthabi) for Young Women in Lesotho: Quantitative Study.

Nkabane-Nkholongo E, Mpata-Mokgatle M, Jack B, Julce C, Bickmore T JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e52048.

PMID: 38470460 PMC: 10966441. DOI: 10.2196/52048.


RACares: a conceptual design to guide mHealth relational agent development based on a systematic review.

Islam A, Chaudhry B, Islam A Mhealth. 2024; 10:11.

PMID: 38323144 PMC: 10839507. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-23-46.


Change in Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge among Young Women Using the Conversational Agent "Nthabi" in Lesotho: A Clinical Trial.

Nkabane-Nkholongo E, Mokgatle M, Bickmore T, Julce C, Thompson D, Jack B Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38234736 PMC: 10793503. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3788533/v1.


India's Opportunity to Address Human Resource Challenges in Healthcare.

Saxena S, Godfrey T Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40274.

PMID: 37448434 PMC: 10336366. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40274.


References
1.
Glasgow R, Vogt T, Boles S . Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9):1322-7. PMC: 1508772. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322. View

2.
Sanders M . Community-based parenting and family support interventions and the prevention of drug abuse. Addict Behav. 2000; 25(6):929-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00128-3. View

3.
Nadzam D, Macklis R . Promoting patient safety: is technology the solution?. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001; 27(8):430-6. DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27037-0. View

4.
Kumpfer K, Alvarado R, Smith P, Bellamy N . Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions. Prev Sci. 2002; 3(3):241-6. DOI: 10.1023/a:1019902902119. View

5.
. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am Psychol. 2003; 57(12):1060-73. View