» Articles » PMID: 31189982

Fracture Prediction, Imaging and Screening in Osteoporosis

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2019 Jun 14
PMID 31189982
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osteoporosis is associated with increased fragility of bone and a subsequent increased risk of fracture. The diagnosis of osteoporosis is intimately linked with the imaging and quantification of bone and BMD. Scanning modalities, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or quantitative CT, have been developed and honed over the past half century to provide measures of BMD and bone microarchitecture for the purposes of clinical practice and research. Combined with fracture prediction tools such as Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) (which use a combination of clinical risk factors for fracture to provide a measure of risk), these elements have led to a paradigm shift in the ability to diagnose osteoporosis and predict individuals who are at risk of fragility fracture. Despite these developments, a treatment gap exists between individuals who are at risk of osteoporotic fracture and those who are receiving therapy. In this Review, we summarize the epidemiology of osteoporosis, the history of scanning modalities, fracture prediction tools and future directions, including the most recent developments in prediction of fractures.

Citing Articles

Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry-A Novel Tool in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Prediction of Fragility Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Icatoiu E, Vladulescu-Trandafir A, Groseanu L, Berghea F, Cobilinschi C, Potcovaru C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075802 PMC: 11898608. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050555.


Establishing the effect of computed tomography reconstruction kernels on the measure of bone mineral density in opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Matheson B, Boyd S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5449.

PMID: 39953113 PMC: 11828980. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88551-x.


Increase in major osteoporotic fractures after therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Ye C, Zhao B, Leslie W, Ruiz J, Zhao H, Abdel-Wahab N BMJ Oncol. 2025; 3(1):e000398.

PMID: 39886118 PMC: 11347678. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000398.


Assessment of trabecular bone Hounsfield units in the lumbar spine for osteoporosis evaluation in individuals aged 65 and above: a review.

Alharthy A Osteoporos Int. 2024; 36(2):225-233.

PMID: 39738829 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07340-w.


Targeting NAMPT-OPA1 for treatment of senile osteoporosis.

Bai C, Tian B, Zhang M, Qin Q, Shi X, Yang X Aging Cell. 2024; 24(3):e14400.

PMID: 39543818 PMC: 11896342. DOI: 10.1111/acel.14400.


References
1.
Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J . Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations.... Arch Osteoporos. 2013; 8:136. PMC: 3880487. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1. View

2.
Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis J . World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7(5):407-13. DOI: 10.1007/pl00004148. View

3.
Cooper C, Campion G, Melton 3rd L . Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992; 2(6):285-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01623184. View

4.
Chrischilles E, Butler C, Davis C, Wallace R . A model of lifetime osteoporosis impact. Arch Intern Med. 1991; 151(10):2026-32. View

5.
Sambrook P, Cooper C . Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2006; 367(9527):2010-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68891-0. View